Cultural dimensions for user experience: cross-country and cross-product analysis of users' cultural characteristics

The quality of user experience is intricately related to the users' cultural characteristics. However, not many studies have dealt with important cultural characteristics which are closely related to user experience. The main goals of this study are to identify important cultural dimensions that are closely related to the user experience of consumer electronic products and to measure them in different countries with different products. Contextual inquiries and online surveys were conducted in four different countries: the United States, Germany, Russia, and Korea. The study was participated by users of four different consumer electronic products: cellular phones, MP3 players, LCD-TVs, and refrigerators. The study identified ten cultural dimensions that were important to the user experience of consumer electronics. The cultural dimensions were also found to vary across the four different countries and four different products. This paper concludes with a discussion of the study's implications and its limitations.

[1]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Differences in national information infrastructures: the reflection of national cultures , 1997, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Mark Srite,et al.  Information technology and culture: Identifying fragmentary and holistic perspectives of culture , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[3]  D. Victor.  International Business Communication , 1997 .

[4]  R. B. Woodruff,et al.  French versus American consumers’ attachment of value to a product in a common consumption context: A cross-national comparison , 2004 .

[5]  G. Hofstede.  Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[6]  S. Schwartz.  Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. , 1994 .

[7]  Aaron Marcus,et al.  A Practical Set of Culture Dimensions for Global User-Interface Development , 2004, APCHI.

[8]  Heather M. Coon,et al.  Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Norhayati Zakaria,et al.  Applying culture to website design: a comparison of Malaysian and US websites , 2000, SIGDOC.

[10]  E. Diener,et al.  Individualism: A Valid and Important Dimension of Cultural Differences Between Nations , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[11]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  A qualitative cross-national study of cultural influences on mobile data service design , 2005, CHI.

[12]  Alfons Trompenaars,et al.  Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business , 1993 .

[13]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  Variations in value orientations. , 1961 .

[14]  M. Bond,et al.  The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth , 1988 .

[15]  Dee G. Appley.  Beyond Culture , 1977 .

[16]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Culture: a fourth dimension of group support systems , 1994, CACM.

[17]  John C. Condon,et al.  An Introduction to Intercultural Communication , 1985 .

[18]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[19]  Shailey Minocha,et al.  A process model for developing usable cross-cultural websites , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[20]  E. W. Gould,et al.  Crosscurrents: cultural dimensions and global Web user-interface design , 2000, INTR.

[21]  T. Parsons,et al.  Toward a General Theory of Action , 1952 .

[22]  David Matsumoto,et al.  Context-Specific Measurement of Individualism-Collectivism on the Individual Level , 1997 .

[23]  K. Sivakumar,et al.  National Culture and New Product Development: An Integrative Review , 1996 .

[24]  Mathew Hillier,et al.  The role of cultural context in multilingual website usability , 2003, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[25]  A. Thompson.  The study of international relations: Relatively speaking , 1987 .