This paper discusses the issue of anti-dumping (AD) proliferation. AD is used more frequently, by more countries, and against more products than ever in its history. I review AD filing patterns with an emphasis on the scope of countries and industries seeking protection. Recent trends suggest that the widespread embrace of AD protection makes the prospect for AD reform increasingly unlikely. AD is no longer being used solely by high-income developed countries. It is increasingly being used by middle-income and even lower-income countries. New users have chosen to use AD very intensively. Per dollar of imports the new users have filed AD cases up to 15-20 times more frequently than the traditional AD users such as the US and EU. The evolving set of AD users complicates AD negotiations. In the near term, strong opposition by the US and EU makes reform a highly unlikely outcome. In the longer run, rising use of AD against the US and EU could conceivably weaken their support for AD; yet, the same trends that might finally cause the US and EU to realise AD is a failed policy will likely make reform impossible. Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2005.
[1]
M. Zanardi.
Anti-Dumping: What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?
,
2004
.
[2]
Bruce A. Blonigen.
Evolving Discretionary Practices of U.S. Antidumping Activity
,
2003
.
[3]
J. Finger,et al.
Antidumping as Safeguard Policy
,
2001
.
[4]
Thomas J. Prusa.
On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping
,
1999
.
[5]
Jorge Miranda,et al.
The International Use of Antidumping: 1987-1997
,
1998,
Journal of World Trade.
[6]
Greg Mastel.
Antidumping laws and the U.S. economy
,
1998
.
[7]
J. Finger,et al.
Antidumping: How It Works and Who Gets Hurt
,
1993
.
[8]
Thomas J. Prusa.
Why are so many antidumping petitions withdrawn
,
1992
.
[9]
James E. Anderson.
Domino Dumping, I: Competitive Exporters
,
1992
.