The gaussian network model: precise prediction of residue fluctuations and application to binding problems.

The single-parameter Gamma matrix of force constants proposed by the Gaussian Network Model (GNM) is iteratively modified to yield native state fluctuations that agree exactly with experimentally observed values. The resulting optimized Gamma matrix contains residue-specific force constants that may be used for an accurate analysis of ligand binding to single or multiple sites on proteins. Bovine Pancreatic Trypsin Inhibitor (BPTI) is used as an example. The calculated off-diagonal elements of the Gamma matrix, i.e., the optimized spring constants, obey a Lorentzian distribution. The mean value of the spring constants is approximately -0.1, a value much weaker than -1 of the GNM. Few of the spring constants are positive, indicating repulsion between residues. Residue pairs with large number of neighbors have spring constants around the mean, -0.1. Large negative spring constants are between highly correlated pairs of residues. The fluctuations of the distance between anticorrelated pairs of residues are subject to smaller spring constants. The importance of the number of neighbors of residue pairs in determining the elements of the Gamma matrix is pointed out. Allosteric effects of binding on a single or multiple residues of BPTI are illustrated and discussed. Comparison of the predictions of the present model with those of the standard GNM shows that the two models agree at lower modes, i.e., those relating to global motions, but they disagree at higher modes. In the higher modes, the present model points to the important contributions from specific residues whereas the standard GNM fails to do so.

[1]  B. Erman,et al.  Relationships between stress, strain, and molecular constitution of polymer networks. Comparison of theory with experiments , 1982 .

[2]  Andrzej Kloczkowski,et al.  Chain dimensions and fluctuations in random elastomeric networks. 1. Phantom Gaussian networks in the undeformed state , 1989 .

[3]  Tirion,et al.  Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[4]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. , 1997, Folding & design.

[5]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Vibrational Dynamics of Folded Proteins: Significance of Slow and Fast Motions in Relation to Function and Stability , 1998 .

[6]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Identification of kinetically hot residues in proteins , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[7]  R L Jernigan,et al.  Collective motions in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: examination of flexibility and enzyme function. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  A. Kidera,et al.  Vibrational energy transfer in a protein molecule. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[9]  Ali Rana Atilgan,et al.  Identifying the adaptive mechanism in globular proteins: Fluctuations in densely packed regions manipulate flexible parts , 2000 .

[10]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Elucidating the structural mechanisms for biological activity of the chemokine family , 2001, Proteins.

[11]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Coordination topology and stability for the native and binding conformers of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 , 2001, Proteins.

[12]  J R Banavar,et al.  Conformations of proteins in equilibrium. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[13]  B. Halle,et al.  Flexibility and packing in proteins , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  G. Phillips,et al.  Dynamics of proteins in crystals: comparison of experiment with simple models. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[15]  D. Ming,et al.  How to describe protein motion without amino acid sequence and atomic coordinates , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  A. Kidera,et al.  Temperature Dependence of Vibrational Energy Transfer in a Protein Molecule , 2003 .

[17]  I. Bahar,et al.  Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  M. Wall,et al.  Allostery in a coarse-grained model of protein dynamics. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[19]  Taner Z Sen,et al.  The Extent of Cooperativity of Protein Motions Observed with Elastic Network Models Is Similar for Atomic and Coarser-Grained Models. , 2006, Journal of chemical theory and computation.