Nonlinear dynamic foundation and frame structure response observed in geotechnical centrifuge experiments

Abstract Soil–foundation–structure interaction (SFSI) and structure–soil–structure interaction (SSSI) influence the seismic response of a structure. Yet, consideration of nonlinear SFSI and SSSI in design practice is lacking. In this paper data from two centrifuge tests are examined. During each test, inelastic models of (1) a low-rise frame with shallowly embedded footings and (2) a mid-rise frame with a large basement are subjected to earthquake motions. In the first test, the structures are separated. In the second test, the structures are placed next to each other. Results show that the presence of the deep basement affects the moment–rotation behavior of the adjacent shallow footings, stiffening the response in the direction of loading towards the basement. This can be attributed to the additional restraint provided by the basement. Although the presence of the basement stiffens the response, it also limits the permanent displacements of the footing, which in turn limits physical damage to the superstructure. These results suggest that in addition to considering nonlinear SFSI effects, SSSI should be considered in the design of closely clustered structures.

[1]  Mehmet Çelebi,et al.  Seismic responses of two adjacent buildings. II. Interaction , 1993 .

[2]  Jonathan D. Bray,et al.  DESIGN GROUND MOTIONS NEAR ACTIVE FAULTS , 2009 .

[3]  Tara C. Hutchinson,et al.  Centrifuge modeling of load-deformation behavior of rocking shallow foundations , 2005 .

[4]  Seismic motion in urban sites consisting of blocks in welded contact with a soft layer overlying a hard half‐space , 2006, physics/0610277.

[5]  Alain Pecker,et al.  Cyclic macro‐element for soil–structure interaction: material and geometrical non‐linearities , 2001 .

[6]  Prishati Raychowdhury,et al.  Performance evaluation of a nonlinear Winkler‐based shallow foundation model using centrifuge test results , 2009 .

[7]  Michael H. Scott,et al.  Nonlinear Finite-Element Analysis Software Architecture Using Object Composition , 2010, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[8]  Venera Vukašinović,et al.  Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis that promotes FEMA 440 , 2007 .

[9]  Ioannis Anastasopoulos,et al.  Rocking Isolated Frame Structures: Margins of Safety against Toppling Collapse and Simplified Design Approach , 2012 .

[10]  Michio Iguchi,et al.  Models test on dynamic structure–structure interaction of nuclear power plant buildings , 1999 .

[12]  F. Behnamfar,et al.  Dynamic response of adjacent structures under spatially variable seismic waves , 1999 .

[13]  T. Nozawa,et al.  Forced vibration tests and simulation analyses of a nuclear reactor building , 1998 .

[14]  Mehmet Çelebi,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSES OF TWO ADJACENT BUILDINGS. I: DATA AND ANALYSES , 1993 .

[15]  Juan J. Aznárez,et al.  DYNAMIC STRUCTURE SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION BETWEEN NEARBY PILED BUILDINGS UNDER SEISMIC EXCITATION BY BEM-FEM MODEL , 2009 .

[16]  George Gazetas,et al.  SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION: BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL? , 2000 .

[17]  Jonathan D. Bray,et al.  Seismic System Identification Using Centrifuge-based Soil-Structure Interaction Test Data , 2013 .

[18]  J. E. Luco,et al.  Seismic Response of a Periodic Array of Structures , 1977 .

[19]  Michael Iten,et al.  Fibre optic cable and micro-anchor pullout tests in sand , 2010 .

[20]  Michael H. Scott,et al.  Plastic Hinge Integration Methods for Force-Based Beam¿Column Elements , 2006 .

[21]  Prishati Raychowdhury,et al.  Nonlinear Winkler-based shallow foundation model for performance assessment of seismically loaded structures , 2008 .

[22]  Ioannis Anastasopoulos,et al.  Rocking isolation of low‐rise frame structures founded on isolated footings , 2012 .

[23]  J. Enrique Luco,et al.  Dynamic structure-soil-structure interaction , 1973, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[24]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[25]  Sivapalan Gajan,et al.  Contact Interface Model for Shallow Foundations Subjected to Combined Cyclic Loading , 2009 .

[26]  Nathan M. Newmark,et al.  A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics , 1959 .

[27]  George Gazetas,et al.  The role of soil in the collapse of 18 piers of Hanshin Expressway in the Kobe earthquake , 2006 .

[28]  Lijun Deng,et al.  Characterization of rocking shallow foundations using centrifuge model tests , 2012 .

[29]  Tara C. Hutchinson,et al.  Investigation into the Effects of Foundation Uplift on Simplified Seismic Design Procedures , 2006 .

[30]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Two-dimensional, antiplane, building-soil-building interaction for two or more buildings and for incident planet SH waves , 1975 .

[31]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  System identification for evaluating soil–structure interaction effects in buildings from strong motion recordings , 1998 .

[32]  Marius Ghergu,et al.  Structure-soil-structure coupling in seismic excitation and city effect , 2009 .

[33]  Jonathan D. Bray,et al.  Seismic soil–foundation–structure interaction observed in geotechnical centrifuge experiments , 2013 .

[34]  Erdal Şafak.  Identification of Linear Structures Using Discrete‐Time Filters , 1991 .

[35]  Jonathan D. Bray,et al.  Earthquake motion selection and calibration for use in a geotechnical centrifuge , 2010 .

[36]  G. Fenves,et al.  Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. II: Empirical findings , 1999 .

[37]  P. C. Jennings.  Distant motions from a building vibration test , 1970, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[38]  D. A. Wesley,et al.  Soil-structure interaction of nuclear reactor structures considering through-soil coupling between adjacent structures , 1973 .

[39]  Meng-Lin Lou,et al.  Structure–soil–structure interaction: Literature review , 2011 .