Affective Intuition and Task-Contingent Affect Regulation

Mood influences cognitive activity and behavior in systematic ways. Since such affective contingencies are repeatedly and broadly experienced, they should be available for learning and possibly conscious introspection. We examine the role of such intuitive theories in guiding affect regulation in a series of four studies and show that even suboptimal hedonic adjustments (i.e., preferences for the negative pole of the affective spectrum such as negative mood maintenance) were deliberately chosen in an attempt to match cognitive requirements of forthcoming tasks. We contrast affect discrepancy and strength of signal hypotheses to explain how affect regulation goals are activated.

[1]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Mood management across affective states: the hedonic contingency hypothesis. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  N. Schwarz.  Feelings as information: Implications for affective influences on information processing. , 2001 .

[3]  F. Hesse,et al.  Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures : a meta-analysis , 1996 .

[4]  D. Wegner,et al.  On being cool and collected: mood regulation in anticipation of social interaction. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: if you feel bad, do it! , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Peter Weinberg,et al.  Impulsive consumer buying as a result of emotions , 1982 .

[7]  G. Clore,et al.  Feelings and phenomenal experiences , 1996 .

[8]  R. Erber,et al.  The Role of Motivated Social Cognition in the Regulation of Affective States , 2000 .

[9]  J. Forgas.  Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition , 2001 .

[10]  Joel B. Cohen,et al.  Affect Monitoring and the Primacy of Feelings in Judgment , 2001 .

[11]  A. Isen,et al.  The influence of positive affect on acceptable level of risk: The person with a large canoe has a large worry , 1987 .

[12]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Happy and Mindless, But Sad and Smart? The Impact of Affective States on Analytic Reasoning , 1991 .

[13]  C. Gohm.  Mood regulation and emotional intelligence: individual differences. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Khalid Al-Abbadey.  The biopsychology of mood and arousal , 1991 .

[15]  W. Gerrod Parrott,et al.  Beyond hedonism: Motives for inhibiting good moods and for maintaining bad moods. , 1993 .

[16]  D. Bem.  An experimental analysis of self-persuasion☆ , 1965 .

[17]  John D. Hey,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[18]  S. Epstein,et al.  Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  A. Isen,et al.  Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  F. Strack,et al.  Mood and Persuasion , 1990 .

[21]  Joel B. Cohen,et al.  When Communications Collide with Recipients' Actions: Effects of Post-Message Behavior on Intentions to Follow the Message Recommendation , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[22]  Dennis W. Rook.  The Buying Impulse , 1987 .

[23]  R. Thayer.  The biopsychology of mood and arousal , 1989 .

[24]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Altruism as hedonism: a social development perspective on the relationship of negative mood state and helping. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  A. Isen,et al.  The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.