Uncertainty Analysis for Characterization of a Commercial Real-Time Oscilloscope Using a Calibrated Pulse Standard

In this paper, we describe a traceable measurement method for the frequency response of commercial real-time digital oscilloscopes (RTDOs). Since the commercial RTDOs usually use multiple analog digital convertors (ADCs), it is very challenging to characterize each ADC without having access to the internal circuitry. In this study, we use an additional continuous wave (CW) source to match the sampling sequence in a time interleaved ADC (TIADC). We also use a calibrated pulse standard traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Since the sampling rate of a single ADC is greatly reduced, we slightly misalign the sampling rate of the pulse and the single ADC and then stack the multiple measured pulses as a single pulse. As a result, the sampling rate can be greatly increased by about 8000 times. The frequency response of the RTDO during testing shows a variation of ±1 dB in amplitude and ±7° in phase between ADCs at the maximum operating frequency. These differences need to be calibrated as they cause systematic errors in the measurement. The 95% confidence interval of the measured frequency response is about 0.2 dB in amplitude and 3° in phase. Finally, the measured amplitude is compared with the swept sine measurement method, which confirms that they agree well within its uncertainties.

[1]  W. Black,et al.  Time interleaved converter arrays , 1980, 1980 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers.

[2]  Jin-Seob Kang,et al.  Characterization of a 1 mm (DC to 110 GHz) Calibration Kit for VNA , 2019, Journal of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science.

[3]  Dylan F. Williams,et al.  Terminology for high-speed sampling-oscilloscope calibration , 2006, 2006 68th ARFTG Conference: Microwave Measurement.

[4]  Dong-Joon Lee,et al.  Frequency response of real-time digital oscilloscope with timeinterleaving architecture , 2019, 2019 93rd ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference (ARFTG).

[5]  P. Hale,et al.  Covariance-based uncertainty analysis of the NIST electrooptic sampling system , 2006, IEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques.

[6]  Joo-Gwang Lee,et al.  Calibration of channel mismatch in time-interleaved real-time digital oscilloscopes , 2015, 2015 85th Microwave Measurement Conference (ARFTG).

[7]  S. Geer Least Squares Estimation , 2005 .

[8]  Dylan F. Williams,et al.  Covariance-Based Vector-Network-Analyzer Uncertainty Analysis for Time- and Frequency-Domain Measurements , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[9]  Dylan F. Williams,et al.  Physical models for 2.4 mm and 3.5 mm coaxial VNA calibration kits developed within the NIST microwave uncertainty framework , 2015, 2015 85th Microwave Measurement Conference (ARFTG).

[10]  A. Dienstfrey,et al.  Minimum-phase calibration of sampling oscilloscopes , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[11]  Dong-Joon Lee,et al.  Traceable calibration for a digital real-time oscilloscope with time interleaving architecture , 2017 .

[12]  Jeffrey A. Jargon,et al.  Calibration of Time-Interleaved Errors in Digital Real-Time Oscilloscopes , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[13]  Joo-Gwang Lee,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis in EVM Measurement Using a Monte Carlo Simulation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.