Assessment of Mathematics Learning: What Are We Doing?

During this review period it is evident that Australasia is in need of a research agenda that critically analyses the impact and use of national external and international assessments, as well as issues related to classroom-based assessment. Although these are investigated at many levels, the question remains: Are we assessing what we really need to assess? Issues remain in relation to what national and international testing reports to the community, as well as validity issues around how it is used, and accountability. In addition, school-based assessment includes assessment “of”, “as”, and “for” learning with pockets of research applying a fine-grained review. The role that technology plays in classrooms and large-scale assessments is worthy of continued exploration in the light of available and changing tools. Assessment in the mathematics classroom has the potential to alter the experiences of children in our schools at every level. This chapter provides a balanced review and critique of research related to assessment completed within the timeframe of this review. The authors position the discussion in the context of current agendas and consider the impact the mathematics education community has had to date, and the future potential of the community to inform assessment practices and wider discussion.

[1]  T. Meaney,et al.  Indigenous Students and the Learning of Mathematics , 2012 .

[2]  G. Leder.  Mathematics for All? The Case for and Against National Testing , 2015 .

[3]  Angela Rogers.  Steps in Developing a Quality Whole Number Place Value Assessment for Years 3-6: Unmasking the "Experts". , 2012 .

[4]  Steven Nisbet,et al.  The Role of Context Expertise When Comparing Data , 2011 .

[5]  Equity and the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics , 2012 .

[6]  Marina Papic.  An Early Mathematical Patterning Assessment: identifying young Australian Indigenous children’s patterning skills , 2015 .

[7]  Lorna Quinnell,et al.  Cracking the language code: NAPLAN numeracy tests in years 7 and 9 , 2011 .

[8]  Sue Dockett,et al.  Noticing young children's mathematical strengths and agency , 2013 .

[9]  Carmel M. Diezmann,et al.  A framework for mathematics graphical tasks: the influence of the graphic element on student sense making , 2012 .

[10]  A. MacDonald,et al.  A snapshot of young children's mathematical competencies: results from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children , 2015 .

[11]  N. Dulfer,et al.  The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families , 2012 .

[12]  Rosemary Callingham.  ISSUES FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND MEASUREMENT OF STATISTICAL UNDERSTANDING IN A TECHNOLOGY-RICH ENVIRONMENT , 2010 .

[13]  Thomas Lowrie,et al.  Do students solve graphic tasks with spatial demands differently in digital form , 2014 .

[14]  M. Goos,et al.  Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic instrument to assess middle-years students’ proportional reasoning , 2013 .

[15]  Patrick Griffin,et al.  The Changing Role of Education and Schools , 2012 .

[16]  A. Noyes,et al.  Assessing ‘functionality’ in school mathematics examinations: what does being human have to do with it? , 2012 .

[17]  Vicki Steinle,et al.  Identifying Stages in a Learning Hierarchy for Use in Formative Assessment - the Example of Line Graphs. , 2012 .

[18]  Colin Carmichael,et al.  Predictors of numeracy performance in national testing programs: insights from the longitudinal study of Australian children , 2014 .

[19]  Alvin Vista.  The role of reading comprehension in maths achievement growth: Investigating the magnitude and mechanism of the mediating effect on maths achievement in Australian classrooms , 2013 .

[20]  M. Goos,et al.  The Role of Digital Technologies in Numeracy Teaching and Learning , 2015 .

[21]  Sue Thomson,et al.  PISA 2012 : how Australia measures up : the PISA 2012 assessment of students’ mathematical, scientific and reading literacy , 2013 .

[22]  Julie Clark,et al.  Designing Tasks to Promote and Assess Mathematical Transfer in Primary School Children. , 2013 .

[23]  Paul White,et al.  Pressure to Perform: Reviewing the Use of Data through Professional Learning Conversations , 2012 .

[24]  Thomas Lowrie,et al.  The model method: Students' performance and its effectiveness , 2014 .

[25]  Helen Forgasz,et al.  FACTORS IMPLICATED IN HIGH MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT , 2013 .

[26]  Karen Major,et al.  The Development of an Assessment Tool: Student Knowledge of the Concept of Place Value. , 2012 .

[27]  Wenshu Luo,et al.  Assessment and the logic of instructional practice in Secondary 3 English and mathematics classrooms in Singapore , 2013 .

[28]  R. Schwab.  Indigenous Early School Leavers: Failure, Risk and High-Stakes Testing , 2012 .

[29]  H. Chick,et al.  Average: the juxtaposition of procedure and context , 2014, Mathematics Education Research Journal.

[30]  Sandi Tait-McCutcheon,et al.  The Individual Basic Facts Assessment Tool. , 2015 .

[31]  Carmel M. Diezmann,et al.  Co-thought gestures: Supporting students to successfully navigate map tasks , 2014 .

[32]  Iddo Gal,et al.  Comparison of PIAAC and PISA Frameworks for Numeracy and Mathematical Literacy , 2014 .

[33]  Language matters in demonstrations of understanding in early years mathematics assessment , 2013 .

[34]  Kate Highfield,et al.  The impact of a patterns and early algebra program on children in transition to school in Australian indigenous communities , 2015 .

[35]  G. Marks.  Are school-SES effects statistical artefacts? Evidence from longitudinal population data , 2015 .