Innovations in the Assessment of Transplant Center Performance: Implications for Quality Improvement

Continuous quality improvement efforts have become a central focus of leading health care organizations. The transplant community has been a pioneer in periodic review of clinical outcomes to ensure the optimal use of limited donor organs. Through data collected from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) and analyzed by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), transplantation professionals have intermittent access to specific, accurate and clinically relevant data that provides information to improve transplantation. Statistical process control techniques, including cumulative sum charts (CUSUM), are designed to provide continuous, real‐time assessment of clinical outcomes. Through the use of currently collected data, CUSUMs can be constructed that provide risk‐adjusted program‐specific data to inform quality improvement programs. When retrospectively compared to currently available data reporting, the CUSUM method was found to detect clinically significant changes in center performance more rapidly, which has the potential to inform center leadership and enhance quality improvement efforts.

[1]  Pinaki Biswas,et al.  A risk‐adjusted CUSUM in continuous time based on the Cox model , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  G. Fried,et al.  "First, do no harm": monitoring outcomes during the transition from open to laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in a Canadian centre. , 2008, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[3]  D. Watters,et al.  TIME TO CUSUM: SIMPLIFIED REPORTING OF OUTCOMES IN COLORECTAL SURGERY , 2007, ANZ journal of surgery.

[4]  R. Porcher,et al.  Quality control of surgical and interventional procedures: a review of the CUSUM , 2007, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[5]  Measuring surgeon performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer treatment by cumulative sum analysis. , 2007, American journal of surgery.

[6]  R. Wolfe,et al.  SRTR Center‐Specific Reporting Tools: Posttransplant Outcomes , 2006, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[7]  R M Merion,et al.  Transplant Center Quality Assessment Using a Continuously Updatable, Risk‐Adjusted Technique (CUSUM) , 2006, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[8]  R. Merion The 2005 SRTR Report on the State of Transplantation , 2005 .

[9]  Vern T. Farewell,et al.  An overview of risk‐adjusted charts , 2004 .

[10]  Martin Bland,et al.  Retrospective cohort study of false alarm rates associated with a series of heart operations: the case for hospital mortality monitoring groups , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  V T Farewell,et al.  Use of risk-adjusted CUSUM and RSPRTcharts for monitoring in medical contexts , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[12]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  R J Cook,et al.  Risk-Adjusted Monitoring of Binary Surgical Outcomes , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[14]  S. Steiner,et al.  Monitoring surgical performance using risk-adjusted cumulative sum charts. , 2000, Biostatistics.

[15]  J Lovegrove,et al.  Monitoring the performance of cardiac surgeons , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[16]  P Littlejohns,et al.  Cumulative risk adjusted mortality chart for detecting changes in death rate: observational study of heart surgery , 1998, BMJ.

[17]  Chris Sherlaw-Johnson,et al.  Monitoring the results of cardiac surgery by variable life-adjusted display , 1997, The Lancet.

[18]  M R de Leval,et al.  Analysis of a cluster of surgical failures. Application to a series of neonatal arterial switch operations. , 1994, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  H. Wohl The cusum plot: its utility in the analysis of clinical data. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  D. Vere,et al.  Why don't doctors use cusums? , 1974, Lancet.

[21]  G. Barnard Control Charts and Stochastic Processes , 1959 .

[22]  G. A. Barnard,et al.  Sampling Inspection and Statistical Decisions , 1954 .

[23]  E. S. Page CONTINUOUS INSPECTION SCHEMES , 1954 .

[24]  A. R. Crathorne,et al.  Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. , 1933 .