Data-source Effects on the Sensitivities and Specificities of Clinical Features in the Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis

An experimental computer system was developed to support diagnosis of rheumatic disorders by computing diagnostic probabilities using modified likelihood ratios. The authors examined whether the performance of the model was affected by the settings in which the data used to derive the likelihood ratios were collected. The sensitivities and specificities of various clinical features for diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were obtained from: 1) a study of 1,570 consecutive outpatients at a rheumatology clinic; 2) a review of the literature; 3) estimates by rheumatologists; and 4) a population study. Considerable variations in sensitivity and specificity but satisfactory agreement in likelihood ratios were found across the four data sets. The likelihood ratios were then used to compute the probabilities of RA in a test series of 570 of the rheumatology clinic outpatients. The model's diagnoses with likelihood ratios from the other sources were adequate. When the likelihood ratios from these sources were combined, discrimination came close to what could be achieved by using the likelihood ratios based on the data from the clinic. The method applied in the study, which makes use of variation of input data instead of variation of test series, and the results are relevant to assessing the external validity and transferability of Bayesian decision-support systems. Key words: rheumatoid arthritis; diagnosis; decision analysis; knowledge acquisition. (Med Decis Making 1992;12:250-258)

[1]  Spiegelhalter Dj Statistical methodology for evaluating gastrointestinal symptoms. , 1985 .

[2]  van Bemmel Jh,et al.  Formalization of medical knowledge. , 1986 .

[3]  W. E. Reynolds,et al.  Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Definition of the Disease and a Clinical Description Based on a Numerical Study of 293 Patients and Controls , 1957 .

[4]  A. L. Kidd,et al.  Knowledge acquisition for expert systems: a practical handbook , 1987 .

[5]  A. Cats,et al.  Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Zoetermeer survey. Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Dutch population with that in 10 other populations. , 1989, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[6]  H. J. Moens,et al.  Comparison of rheumatological diagnoses by a Bayesian program and by physicians. , 1991 .

[7]  T Chard,et al.  Qualitative Probability versus Quantitative Probability in Clinical Diagnosis , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[8]  H J Moens,et al.  Computer-assisted diagnosis of rheumatic disorders. , 1991, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  Yun Peng,et al.  A Probabilistic Causal Model for Diagnostic Problem Solving Part II: Diagnostic Strategy , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  R. Knill-Jones,et al.  Computer aided diagnosis of jaundice. A comparison of two data bases. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. Supplement.

[11]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Clinical Decision Analysis , 1980 .

[12]  R M Centor,et al.  Eualuating Physicians' Probabilistic Judgments , 1988, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[13]  H J Moens,et al.  Development and validation of a computer program using Bayes's theorem to support diagnosis of rheumatic disorders. , 1992, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[14]  W O Robertson Quantifying the meanings of words. , 1983, JAMA.

[15]  A. Dannenberg,et al.  Enhancement of Clinical Predictive Ability by Computer Consultation) , 1979, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[16]  J A Reggia,et al.  Transferability of Medical Decision Support Systems Based on Bayesian Classification , 1983, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[17]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[18]  D. Spiegelhalter Statistical methodology for evaluating gastrointestinal symptoms. , 1985, Clinics in gastroenterology.

[19]  J. Toogood,et al.  WHAT DO WE MEAN BY "USUALLY"? , 1980, The Lancet.

[20]  D. Berman,et al.  Application of conditional probability analysis to the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. , 1980, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[21]  F. T. de Dombal,et al.  Computer-Assisted Diagnosis of Abdominal Pain using “Estimates” Provided by Clinicians , 1972, British medical journal.

[22]  Alison L. Kidd,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems , 1987 .