Small-loop electromagnetic induction for environmental studies at industrial plants

The focus of this study is to analyse the reliability of using small-loop frequency-domain electromagnetic induction systems for characterizing buried storage tanks and pipes at industrial plants. As examples, we selected two areas of a chemical plant, one located outdoors and the other inside a room of reduced dimensions. We collected data employing different system orientations and acquisition directions, in order to compare the influence of environmental noise and neighbouring structures on each case. We found that the presence of a metallic gate or other metallic stuff in a neighbouring wall introduces strong distortions in the responses obtained near these objects. The responses decrease when the coils are coplanar with the wall and increase when they are perpendicular to it. Noise levels were higher for the data acquired indoors, but even in this case, we could enhance the signal-to-noise ratios up to very acceptable values by applying a novel spatial filtering technique. This improved the visualization of the anomalies associated with the targets. Finally, we generated pseudo 3D electrical models of the subsoil, by combining the results of the 1D inversions of the filtered data corresponding to the configuration that best evidenced the structures buried on each sector. In both areas, we obtained quite good approximate characterizations of the geometry, conductivity and depth of the detected tanks and pipes, as was later confirmed during remediation works. Remarkably, the model obtained for the area located indoors had enough resolution as to define the existence of two separate, adjacent tanks.

[1]  Thomas H. Bell,et al.  Electromagnetic induction spectroscopy for clearing landmines , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  T. Levy,et al.  Magnetic and Electromagnetic Induction Studies at Archaeological Sites in Southwestern Jordan , 2003 .

[3]  T. Ritchie,et al.  Mining, Environmental, Petroleum, and Engineering Industry Applications of Electromagnetic Techniques in Geophysics , 2005 .

[4]  E. Haber,et al.  Inversion of 3D electromagnetic data in frequency and time domain using an inexact all-at-once approach , 2004 .

[5]  M. A. Pérez-Flores,et al.  Imaging low-frequency and dc electromagnetic fields using a simple linear approximation , 2001 .

[6]  I. J. Won Small frequency-domain electromagnetic induction sensors How in The world does a small broadband EMI sensor with little or no source-receiver separation work? , 2003 .

[7]  Thomas H. Bell,et al.  Simple phenomenological models for wideband frequency-domain electromagnetic induction , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  A. Osella,et al.  EMI data from an archaeological resistive target revisited , 2006 .

[9]  Irma Shamatava,et al.  Theoretical analysis and range of validity of TSA formulation for application to UXO discrimination , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  Simultaneous 1D inversion of loop loop electromagnetic data for magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity , 2003 .

[11]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Simultaneous 1 D inversion of loop – loop electromagnetic data for magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity , 2003 .

[12]  J. D. Mcneill Electromagnetic Terrain Conduc-tivity Measurement at Low Induction Numbers , 1980 .

[13]  Dwain K. Butler Report on a workshop on electromagnetic induction methods for UXO detection and discrimination , 2004 .

[14]  E. Auken,et al.  A survey of current trends in near-surface electrical and electromagnetic methods , 2006 .

[15]  A. Marui,et al.  Various-scale electromagnetic investigations of high-salinity zones in a coastal plain , 2006 .

[16]  Louise Pellerin,et al.  Multi-dimensional electromagnetic modeling and inversion with application to near-surface earth investigations , 2005 .

[17]  I. J. Won,et al.  GEM‐2: A New Multifrequency Electromagnetic Sensor , 1996 .

[18]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Three‐dimensional massively parallel electromagnetic inversion—I. Theory , 1997 .

[19]  Ana Osella,et al.  Modeling Broadband Electromagnetic Induction Responses of 2-D Multilayered Structures , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[20]  Patricia Martinelli,et al.  Laterally filtered 1D inversions of small-loop, frequency-domain EMI data from a chemical waste site , 2008 .

[21]  Max A. Meju,et al.  A multidimensional horizontal-loop controlled-source electromagnetic inversion method and its use to characterize heterogeneity in aquiferous fractured crystalline rocks , 2006 .

[22]  Ana Osella,et al.  3D electrical imaging of an archaeological site using electrical and electromagnetic methods , 2005 .

[23]  I. J. Won,et al.  Conductivity and Susceptibility Mapping Using Broadband Electromagnetic Sensors , 2000 .

[24]  M. V. Bongiovanni,et al.  Rapid evaluation of multifrequency EMI data to characterize buried structures at a historical Jesuit Mission in Argentina , 2008 .

[25]  Depth of investigation for small broadband electromagnetic sensors , 2005 .