Vegetation structure in cerrado physiognomies in south-eastern Brazil.

We studied three cerrado physiognomies (campo cerrado, a savanna woodland; cerrado sensu stricto, a woodland; and cerradão, a tall woodland) in a reserve with 1,225 ha, in Santa Rita do Passa-Quatro (21 degrees 36-38'S and 47 degrees 36-39'W), São Paulo State, South-eastern Brazil, to compare plant communities structure. As descriptors of the vegetation structure, we used richness, density, basal area, cylindrical volume, and diversity. Ten 40 m2 quadrats were placed randomly in each physiognomy, in which we sampled the woody plants with stem diameter equal or larger than 1 cm (woody component), and ten 2.5 m2 quadrats, in which we sampled the woody plants with stem diameter smaller than 1 cm and all the non-woody individuals (herbaceous component). In the woody component, we found significant differences among the physiognomies for richness, density and cylindrical volume. Cylindrical volume increased from campo cerrado to cerradão, but richness and density were higher in cerrado sensu stricto. In the herbaceous component, we detected differences for all variables, which were higher in the savanna physiognomies, campo cerrado and cerrado sensu stricto, than in the forest physiognomy, cerradão. Cylindrical volume was the best variable to distinguish the physiognomies. Floristic similarity followed the campo cerrado-cerrado sensu stricto-cerradão gradient, and beta diversity was higher in the herbaceous component.

[1]  A. Magurran Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[2]  A. G. Marshall,et al.  The Ecology of Neotropical Savannas. , 1984 .

[3]  M. G. Ferri,et al.  Ecologia do cerrado , 1979 .

[4]  A. S. Lopes,et al.  Cerrado Vegetation in Brazil: An Edaphic Gradient1 , 1977 .

[5]  W. Mantovani,et al.  Identificacao de fisionomias de cerrado com imagem indice de vegetacao , 1996 .

[6]  Vânia Regina Pivello,et al.  PROPOSTA de Zoneamento Ecológico para a RESERVA DE Cerrado Pé-de-Gigante (Santa Rita do Passa Quatro, SP) , 1998 .

[7]  R. Goodland A Physiognomic Analysis of the `Cerrado' Vegetation of Central Brasil , 1971 .

[8]  M. Hill,et al.  Data analysis in community and landscape ecology , 1987 .

[9]  Leopoldo Magno Coutinho,et al.  O conceito do cerrado , 1978 .

[10]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[11]  J. F. Ribeiro,et al.  Fitofisionomias do bioma cerrado. , 1998 .

[12]  F. Martins,et al.  HOW RICH IS THE FLORA OF BRAZILIAN CERRADOS , 1999 .

[13]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology , 1974 .

[14]  J. A. Ratter,et al.  The Brazilian Cerrado Vegetation and Threats to its Biodiversity , 1997 .

[15]  Franklin Galvão,et al.  Análise da estrutura de duas unidades fitofisionômicas de savana (cerrado) no sul do Brasil , 1998 .

[16]  F. R. Martins,et al.  Floristica e fitossociologia de um cerrado marginal brasileiro, parque estadual de Vaçununga, Santa Rita do Passa Quatro , 1987 .

[17]  H. Hartley,et al.  The maximum F-ratio as a short-cut test for heterogeneity of variance. , 1950, Biometrika.

[18]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Evolution of Species Diversity in Land Communities , 1977 .