Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the trifecta outcomes following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and compare the results applying definitions of continence and potency as reported in the literature vs validated questionnaire. The trifecta rate of achieving continence, potency, and undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) following radical prostatectomy has been estimated to be approximately 60% at 1-2 years in open radical prostatectomy series. The definitions of continence and potency were not standardized, which poses difficulty in comparing published results. METHODS A prospective, institutional RALP database was analyzed for preoperatively continent and potent men with >/= 1 year follow-up after bilateral nerve-sparing surgery. Continence and potency were evaluated preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery by surgeon interview (subjective) and using University of California Los-Angeles Prostate Cancer Index self-administered questionnaire (objective). Biochemical recurrence was defined as a detectable (> 0.05 ng/mL), increasing PSA on 2 consecutive tests. RESULTS Among 1362 consecutive RALPs, 380 patients were preoperatively potent and continent underwent surgery with bilateral nerve-sparing technique and had sufficient follow-up. Trifecta rates applying subjective continence and potency definitions were 34%, 52%, 71%, and 76% at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. The corresponding trifecta rates using objective continence and potency definitions stood at 16%, 31%, 44%, and 44%. The difference was statistically significant at each time point (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS RALP provides trifecta outcome rates comparable to open surgery. The outcome rates vary significantly depending on the tools used for continence and potency evaluation.

[1]  A. Renshaw,et al.  Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  D. Lubeck,et al.  Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: results of the CaPSURE database. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[3]  J. Moul,et al.  Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2008, European urology.

[4]  Kirsten L. Greene,et al.  Who is the average patient presenting with prostate cancer? , 2005, Urology.

[5]  P. Scardino,et al.  Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ("trifecta"). , 2005, Urology.

[6]  Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  A. Shalhav,et al.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. , 2007, European urology.

[8]  C. Abbou,et al.  Combined reporting of cancer control and functional results of radical prostatectomy. , 2003, European urology.

[9]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2005 , 2005, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[10]  P. Pierorazio,et al.  Preoperative risk stratification predicts likelihood of concurrent PSA-free survival, continence, and potency (the trifecta analysis) after radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2007, Urology.

[11]  W. Sause,et al.  Comparison of late rectal toxicity from conventional versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: analysis of clinical and dosimetric factors. , 2005, Urology.

[12]  R H Brook,et al.  The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure. , 1998, Medical care.

[13]  A. Gelet,et al.  Current status of high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: Technology, clinical outcomes, and future , 2008, Current urology reports.

[14]  Michael W Kattan,et al.  Predicting an optimal outcome after radical prostatectomy: the trifecta nomogram. , 2008, The Journal of urology.