Physiological Assessment of Active Middle Ear Implant Coupling to the Round Window in Chinchilla lanigera

Objective. To study the effects of various active middle ear implant loading parameters on round window stimulation in an animal model. Study Design. Physiological measurements of the cochlear microphonic and stapes velocity were made from active middle ear implant–generated sinusoidal stimuli with controlled changes in loading parameters. Setting. Prospective study at an academic research institution. Subjects and Methods. Cochlear microphonic and stapes velocities (H EV ) were measured in 6 study subjects (Chinchilla lanigera) in response to active middle ear implant (Otologics MET, Boulder, Colorado) round window stimulation with assessment of effects of varying parameters of loading pressure, interposed connective tissue, and angle of stimulation with respect to the round window membrane. Results. The measured performance variabilities in repeated applications of the active middle ear implant to the round window were 2.5 dB and 5.0 dB for H EV and cochlear microphonic thresholds, respectively. Loading pressure applied to the round window (51-574 dynes) and angle of approach (±30° with respect to coronal plane) did not have a significant effect on cochlear microphonic thresholds or H EV . Significant improvements in cochlear microphonic thresholds and H EV were observed for interposed connective tissue regardless of tissue type. Conclusion. Variability in performance due to repeated couplings of the active middle ear implant to the round window is small and reproducible. Interposition of connective tissue significantly improves vibration energy transfer to the cochlea. Neither changes in loading pressure nor angle of stimulation of the round window affected active middle ear implant performance.

[1]  Alexander T. Ferber,et al.  Intraoperative adjustments to optimize active middle ear implant performance , 2011, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[2]  E. Truy,et al.  Fully implantable hearing device as a new treatment of conductive hearing loss in Franceschetti syndrome. , 2008, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[3]  Manohar Bance,et al.  Analysis of Vibrant Soundbridge Placement Against the Round Window Membrane in a Human Cadaveric Temporal Bone Model , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[4]  Saumil N Merchant,et al.  Evaluation of Round Window Stimulation Using the Floating Mass Transducer by Intracochlear Sound Pressure Measurements in Human Temporal Bones , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[5]  K. Koka,et al.  Prospective Electrophysiologic Findings of Round Window Stimulation in a Model of Experimentally Induced Stapes Fixation , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[6]  Jennifer L. Thornton,et al.  The effects of experimentally induced conductive hearing loss on spectral and temporal aspects of sound transmission through the ear , 2011, Hearing Research.

[7]  Christian Streitberger,et al.  Coupling the Vibrant Soundbridge to Cochlea Round Window: Auditory Results in Patients With Mixed Hearing Loss , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[8]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Structures that contribute to middle-ear admittance in chinchilla , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[9]  Stefan Stenfelt,et al.  Fluid volume displacement at the oval and round windows with air and bone conduction stimulation. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Martin Kompis,et al.  Factors Improving the Vibration Transfer of the Floating Mass Transducer at the Round Window , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[11]  S. Merchant,et al.  Testing a Method for Quantifying the Output of Implantable Middle Ear Hearing Devices , 2007, Audiology and Neurotology.

[12]  S. Tringali,et al.  A Pilot Study of the Safety and Performance of the Otologics Fully Implantable Hearing Device: Transducing Sounds via the Round Window Membrane to the Inner Ear , 2008, Audiology and Neurotology.

[13]  M. Carner,et al.  TORP vs round window implant for hearing restoration of patients with extensive ossicular chain defect , 2009, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[14]  K. Koka,et al.  Electrocochleographic and mechanical assessment of round window stimulation with an active middle ear prosthesis , 2010, Hearing Research.

[15]  E. Truy,et al.  European Results With Totally Implantable Carina Placed on the Round Window: 2-Year Follow-Up , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[16]  Sigfrid D. Soli,et al.  Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[17]  T. Ishii,et al.  Mechanical properties of human round window, basilar and Reissner's membranes. , 1995, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.