A set of scaled mode shapes is a complete representation of the linear dynamic properties of a structure. Mode shapes can be used for a variety of different analyses, including structural modifications, forced response simulations, excitation force calculations from measured responses, and frequency response function (FRF) synthesis for comparison with experimental data. When mode shapes are obtained experimentally from operating data, they are not properly scaled to preserve the mass and elastic properties of the structure. By operating data, we mean that only structural responses were measured – excitation forces were not measured. In this article, we review the traditional methods for scaling experimental mode shapes using FRFs, and also introduce two new methods that do not require FRF measurement. The new methods combine a search algorithm with the SDM (Structural Dynamics Modification or eigenvalue modification) algorithm to perform a series of structural modifications until proper scaling of the mode shapes is achieved. Details of the methods and examples of their use are included. Mode shapes are unique properties of a structure that may each be represented by a mode shape vector, {u k } DOF¥1 , with vector entries representing the motion at each degree-of-freedom (DOF) modeled or measured. Note that {u k } merely describes a shape, not the absolute value of vibratory motion. That is, the amplitude ratios between all vector elements are fixed, but the length of the vector may be arbitrarily selected. Such vectors are often termed eigenvectors. Each is paired with a complex eigenvalue containing a natural frequency at which the mode shape is easily excited and a damping factor describing how rapidly oscillations at the natural frequency in the mode shape decay with time when excitation is removed.
[1]
Mark Richardson,et al.
Is It a Mode Shape, or an Operating Deflection Shape?
,
1997
.
[2]
Brian Schwarz,et al.
Modal Parameter Estimation from Operating Data
,
2003
.
[3]
Brian Schwarz,et al.
Measuring operating deflection shapes under non-stationary conditions
,
2000
.
[4]
Mark H. Richardson,et al.
Measurement and analysis of the dynamics of mechanical structures
,
1979
.
[5]
Ron Potter,et al.
MASS, STIFFNESS, AND DAMPING MATRICES FROM MEASURED MODAL PARAMETERS
,
1974
.
[6]
Sri Welaratna,et al.
Structural Dynamics Modification — An Extension to Modal Analysis
,
1981
.
[7]
Mark H. Richardson,et al.
Derivation of Mass, Stiffness and Damping Parameters From Experimental Modal Data
,
1977
.
[8]
Brian Schwarz,et al.
MODAL PARAMETER ESTIMATION FROM AMBIENT RESPONSE DATA
,
2001
.
[9]
Brian Schwarz,et al.
POST-PROCESSING AMBIENT AND FORCED RESPONSE BRIDGE DATA TO OBTAIN MODAL PARAMETERS
,
2001
.
[10]
Mark H. Richardson.
MODAL MASS, STIFFNESS AND DAMPING
,
2000
.