Cyclosporine pharmacokinetics and dose monitoring after lung transplantation: comparison between cystic fibrosis and other conditions

Background. In cystic fibrosis (CF), absorption of cyclosporine A (CsA) through the gastrointestinal tract is often impaired because of fat malabsorption. The aim of this study was to compare the steady-state pharmacokinetics of CsA and the inter- and intrasubject variability of CsA exposure in stable lung transplant recipients with and without CF and to determine the best single-time predictors of the area under the curve (AUC). Methods. Ten lung transplant recipients without CF and 10 lung transplant recipients with CF were studied. All patients received Neoral twice daily. Blood samples were obtained predose and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 12 h postdose on three separate days within a 5-day period. Results. CsA exposure and pharmacokinetic variables were similar in the two groups, although exposure-per-milligram-per-dose was ∼25% lower in CF patients. Coefficients of intersubject variability were numerically higher in CF patients, but the difference between groups did not reach significance. On the other hand, the maximum concentration (Cmax), the concentration 2 hours after administration (C2), AUC0–12, and AUC0–4 showed a twofold greater intrasubject variability in CF patients. CsA trough concentration did not predict accurately the AUC, but C2 was a good predictor of the AUC0–4 in both CF (r2=0.90) and non-CF (r2=0.78) patients. Conclusion. Compared to patients without CF, patients with CF show a lower bioavailability of CsA and a greater intrasubject variability of Cmax, C2, and AUC. C2 is the best single-point predictor of the AUC0–4 in lung transplant recipients with and without CF.

[1]  Mario A. González,et al.  Evaluation of Orally Administered Highly Variable Drugs and Drug Formulations , 1996, Pharmaceutical Research.

[2]  E. Trulock,et al.  The registry of the international society for heart and lung transplantation: nineteenth official report-2002. , 2002, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[3]  M. Estenne,et al.  Bronchiolitis obliterans after human lung transplantation. , 2002, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[4]  A. Matas,et al.  Predictors of renal function following lung or heart-lung transplantation. , 2002, Kidney international.

[5]  J. Lake,et al.  Patient management by Neoral C2 monitoring: An international consensus statement1 , 2002, Transplantation.

[6]  R. J. Dumont,et al.  A limited sampling strategy for cyclosporine area under the curve monitoring in lung transplant recipients. , 2001, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[7]  B. Kiberd,et al.  Approaching the therapeutic window for cyclosporine in kidney transplantation: a prospective study. , 2001, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[8]  D. de Zeeuw,et al.  Long-term renal outcome after lung transplantation is predicted by the 1-month postoperative renal function loss. , 2000, Transplantation.

[9]  J. Parameshwar,et al.  Randomized, trough blood cyclosporine concentration-controlled trial to compare the pharmacodynamics of Sandimmune and Neoral in de novo lung transplant recipients. , 1999, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[10]  C. Chaparro,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Profile and Variability of Cyclosporine versus Neoral in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis after Lung Transplantation , 1998, Pharmacotherapy.

[11]  M. Reynaud‐Gaubert,et al.  Improved absorption and bioavailability of cyclosporine A from a microemulsion formulation in lung transplant recipients affected with cystic fibrosis. , 1997, Transplantation proceedings.

[12]  H. Van As,et al.  Whole blood cyclosporin monitoring in liver and heart transplant patients: evaluation of the specificity of a fluorescence polarization immunoassay and an enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique. , 1997, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[13]  D. Urbauer,et al.  Variable oral absorption of cyclosporine. A biopharmaceutical risk factor for chronic renal allograft rejection. , 1996, Transplantation.

[14]  J. Alexander,et al.  Reduced inter- and intrasubject variability in cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients treated with a microemulsion formulation in conjunction with fasting, low-fat meals, or high-fat meals. , 1995, Transplantation.

[15]  T. Nagao,et al.  Early fluctuation in cyclosporine A trough levels affects long-term outcome of kidney transplants. , 1994, Transplantation proceedings.

[16]  N. G. Best,et al.  Blood cyclosporin concentrations and the short-term risk of lung rejection following heart-lung transplantation. , 1992, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[17]  D. Holt,et al.  Blood cyclosporin concentrations and renal allograft dysfunction. , 1986, British medical journal.