Novelty vs. Familiarity Principles in Preference Decisions: Task-Context of Past Experience Matters

Our preferences are shaped by past experience in many ways, but a systematic understanding of the factors is yet to be achieved. For example, studies of the mere exposure effect show that experience with an item leads to increased liking (familiarity preference), but the exact opposite tendency is found in other studies utilizing dishabituation (novelty preference). Recently, it has been found that image category affects whether familiarity or novelty preference emerges from repeated stimulus exposure (Park et al., 2010). Faces elicited familiarity preference, but natural scenes elicited novelty preference. In their task, preference judgments were made throughout all exposures, raising the question of whether the task-context during exposure was involved. We adapt their paradigm, testing if passive exposure or objective judgment task-contexts lead to different results. Results showed that after passive viewing, familiar faces were preferred, but no preference bias in either direction was found with natural scenes, or with geometric figures (control). After exposure during the objective judgment task, familiar faces were preferred, novel natural scenes were preferred, and no preference bias was found with geometric figures. The overall results replicate the segregation of preference biases across object categories and suggest that the preference for familiar faces and novel natural scenes are modulated by task-context memory at different processing levels or selection involvement. Possible underlying mechanisms of the two types of preferences are discussed.

[1]  Satsuki Nakai,et al.  Distinguishing novelty and familiarity effects in infant preference procedures , 2004 .

[2]  Heather M. Claypool,et al.  Is It Familiar or Positive? Mutual Facilitation of Response Latencies , 2010 .

[3]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Roles of familiarity and novelty in visual preference judgments are segregated across object categories , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Chad J Marsolek,et al.  What form of memory underlies novelty preferences? , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[6]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[7]  D. Berlyne Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value , 1970 .

[8]  George Mandler,et al.  Nonspecific Effects of Exposure on Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized , 1987 .

[9]  Shu-Chieh Wu,et al.  Characteristics of covert and overt visual orienting: Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  R. Crisp,et al.  When mere exposure leads to less liking: the incremental threat effect in intergroup contexts. , 2009, British journal of psychology.

[11]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  Selective Attention Determines Emotional Responses to Novel Visual Stimuli , 2003, Psychological science.

[12]  R. Bornstein Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[13]  M. Bardo,et al.  The effects of anxiolytic drugs on novelty-induced place preference , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[14]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Subliminal Mere Exposure: Specific, General, and Diffuse Effects , 2000, Psychological science.

[15]  P. Winkielman,et al.  Familiarity and Liking Happiness Cools the Warm Glow of Familiarity: Psychophysiological Evidence That Mood Modulates the Familiarity-affect Link , 2022 .

[16]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[17]  Daniel Tranel,et al.  Preferring one taste over another without recognizing either , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Stephen Meredith Williams Repeated exposure and the attractiveness of synthetic speech: An inverted-U relationship , 1987 .

[19]  Michael T. Bardo,et al.  Conditioned increase in place preference by access to novel objects: antagonism by MK-801 , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[20]  R. Zajonc Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal , 2001 .

[21]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[22]  Jamin Halberstadt,et al.  The affect disruption hypothesis: The effect of analytic thought on the fluency and appeal of art , 2008 .

[23]  R. L. Fantz Visual Experience in Infants: Decreased Attention to Familiar Patterns Relative to Novel Ones , 1964, Science.

[24]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  Almut Hupbach,et al.  The mere exposure effect is sensitive to color information: evidence for color effects in a perceptual implicit memory test. , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[26]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Introspecting about Reasons can Reduce Post-Choice Satisfaction , 1993 .

[27]  R. Bornstein,et al.  The Attribution and Discounting of Perceptual Fluency: Preliminary Tests of a Perceptual Fluency/Attributional Model of the Mere Exposure Effect , 1994 .

[28]  F. Strack,et al.  Motormouth: mere exposure depends on stimulus-specific motor simulations. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  R. Bornstein,et al.  Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Petter Johansson,et al.  Failure to Detect Mismatches Between Intention and Outcome in a Simple Decision Task , 2005, Science.

[32]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  K. Szpunar,et al.  Liking and memory for musical stimuli as a function of exposure. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Exposure, satiation, and stimulus discriminability. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  E. H. Olst The orienting reflex , 1971 .