When you name the pizza you look at the coin and the bread: Eye movements reveal semantic activation during word production

Two eyetracking experiments tested for activation of category coordinate and perceptually related concepts when speakers prepare the name of an object. Speakers saw four visual objects in a 2 3 2 array and identified and named a target picture on the basis of either category (e.g., “What is the name of the musical instrument?”) or visual-form (e.g., “What is the name of the circular object?”) instructions. There were more fixations on visualform competitors and category coordinate competitors than on unrelated objects during name preparation, but the increased overt attention did not affect naming latencies. The data demonstrate that eye movements are a sensitive measure of the overlap between the conceptual (including visual-form) information that is accessed in preparation for word production and the conceptual knowledge associated with visual objects. Furthermore, these results suggest that semantic activation of competitor concepts does not necessarily affect lexical selection, contrary to the predictions of lexical-selection-by-competition accounts (e.g., Levelt, Roelofs, & Meyer, 1999).

[1]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[3]  Michele Miozzo,et al.  Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  A. Cutler,et al.  Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon , 1977 .

[5]  M. Garrett,et al.  Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  Retrieval time from semantic memory , 1969 .

[7]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Lexical Selection is Not a Competitive Process: A Reply to La Heij et al. (2006) , 2006, Cortex.

[9]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[10]  Robert J Hartsuiker,et al.  Semantic and phonological context effects in speech error repair. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Albert Costa,et al.  On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Falk Huettig,et al.  The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search , 2007 .

[13]  A. Meyer The use of eye tracking in studies of sentence generation , 2004 .

[14]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Wido La Heij,et al.  In Defense of the Lexical-Competition Account of Picture-Word Interference: A Comment On Finkbeiner and Caramazza (2006) , 2006, Cortex.

[16]  Roger M. Cooper,et al.  The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. , 1974 .

[17]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[18]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Category Norms: An Updated and Expanded Version of the Battig and Montague (1969) Norms. , 2004 .

[19]  J. Segui,et al.  Semantic and Associative Priming in Picture Naming , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Set size and repetition matter: comment on Caramazza and Costa (2000) , 2001, Cognition.

[21]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Picture Naming in Picture Context: Semantic Interference or Semantic Facilitation? , 2003 .

[22]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  When bees hamper the production of honey: lexical interference from associates in speech production. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production , 2003 .

[24]  Falk Huettig,et al.  The online processing of ambiguous and unambiguous words in context: Evidence from head-mounted eye-tracking , 2004 .

[25]  A. Meyer,et al.  Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  Albert Costa,et al.  The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: does the response set matter? , 2000, Cognition.

[27]  W. Levelt,et al.  Eye movements during the production of nouns and pronouns , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[28]  A. Caramazza,et al.  When more is less: a counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  A. Roelofs,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.

[30]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Constraint, Word Frequency, and the Relationship between Lexical Processing Levels in Spoken Word Production , 1998 .

[31]  S. McDonald,et al.  Models of high-dimensional semantic space predict language-mediated eye movements in the visual world. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[32]  W. Levelt,et al.  Viewing and naming objects: eye movements during noun phrase production , 1998, Cognition.

[33]  Dale S. Klopfer,et al.  Stroop Interference and Color-Word Similarity , 1996 .

[34]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. , 2003, Psychological review.

[35]  Markus F Damian,et al.  Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Sylvia A. A. Van Den Boogaard,et al.  Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access , 2004 .

[37]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[38]  G. Altmann,et al.  Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm , 2005, Cognition.

[39]  R. R. Peterson,et al.  Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. , 1998 .

[40]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[41]  A. Roelofs,et al.  The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production , 1997, Cognition.

[42]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Testing a non-decompositional theory of lemma retrieval in speaking: Retrieval of verbs , 1993, Cognition.

[43]  Scott A. McDonald,et al.  Environmental Determinants of Lexical Processing Effort , 2000 .

[44]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[45]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Where Do Semantic Errors Come From? , 1990, Cortex.

[46]  Falk Huettig,et al.  Visual-shape competition during language-mediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness , 2007 .

[47]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Semantic competition between hierarchically related words during speech planning , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[48]  J. M. Cattell THE TIME IT TAKES TO SEE AND NAME OBJECTS , 1886 .

[49]  Ken McRae,et al.  Category - Specific semantic deficits , 2008 .

[50]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[51]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[52]  Z. Griffin Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .

[53]  W. Glaser,et al.  Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[54]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. , 1995 .

[55]  P. Starreveld,et al.  Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. , 1996 .