Cross-Domain Influences on Creative Processes and Products

According to the honing theory of creativity, the iterative process culminating in a creative work is made possible by the self-organizing nature of a conceptual network, or worldview, and its innate holistic tendency to minimize inconsistency. As such, the creative process is not limited to the problem domain, and influences on creativity from domains other than that of the final product are predicted to be widespread. We conducted a study in which participants with varying levels of creative experience listed their creative outputs, as well as influences (sources of inspiration) on these outputs. Of the 758 creative influences, 13% were within-domain narrow, 13% within-domain broad, 67% cross-domain, and 6% unclear. These findings support the hypothesis that to trace the inspirational sources or 'conceptual parents' of a creative output, and thus track its cultural lineage, one must look beyond the problem domain to the creators' self-organizing, inconsistency-minimizing worldview at large.

[1]  L. Gabora,et al.  The recognizability of individual creative styles within and across domains. , 2012, 1309.2615.

[2]  Michael Cole,et al.  “Minding the Gap”: Imagination, Creativity and Human Cognition , 2011, Integrative psychological & behavioral science.

[3]  Liane Gabora,et al.  An evolutionary framework for cultural change: selectionism versus communal exchange. , 2012, Physics of life reviews.

[4]  L. Gabora Ideas are not replicators but minds are , 2004, q-bio/0402002.

[5]  A. Furnham,et al.  Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality: A Critical Review of the Scattered Literature , 2006, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[6]  Brian O'Connor,et al.  The Cross-Domain Re-interpretation of Artistic Ideas , 2013, CogSci.

[7]  M. Forgeard,et al.  Perceiving benefits after adversity: The relationship between self-reported posttraumatic growth and creativity. , 2013 .

[8]  Babak Saleh,et al.  Knowledge Discovery of Artistic Influences: A Metric Learning Approach , 2014, ICCC.

[9]  L. Gabora AUTOCATALYTIC CLOSURE IN A COGNITIVE SYSTEM: A TENTATIVE SCENARIO FOR THE ORIGIN OF CULTURE , 1998, adap-org/9901002.

[10]  Liane Gabora,et al.  The cultural evolution of socially situated cognition , 2008, Cognitive Systems Research.

[11]  John Baer The Importance of Domain-Specific Expertise in Creativity , 2015 .

[12]  Jordan B. Peterson,et al.  Psychological entropy: a framework for understanding uncertainty-related anxiety. , 2012, Psychological review.

[13]  R. Beghetto,et al.  Why Creativity Is Domain General, Why It Looks Domain Specific, and Why the Distinction Does Not Matter. , 2004 .

[14]  Liane Gabora,et al.  Honing Theory: A Complex Systems Framework for Creativity. , 2016, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[15]  R. Weisberg Prolegomena to theories of insight in problem solving: A taxonomy of problems , 1995 .

[16]  W. Freeman The physiology of perception. , 1991, Scientific American.

[17]  John Baer Domain Specificity and the Limits of Creativity Theory , 2012 .

[18]  John Baer,et al.  Generality of creativity across performance domains , 1991 .

[19]  James C. Kaufman,et al.  The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) Model of Creativity , 2004 .

[20]  Gregory J. Feist A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[21]  Colin Martindale,et al.  Creativity, primary process cognition and personality , 1996 .

[22]  Jonathan S. Feinstein,et al.  The nature of creative development , 2006 .

[23]  Michael F. Andrews Creativity and psychological health : proceedings of the symposia, 1960-61 , 1961 .

[24]  M. Runco Creativity: Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice , 2006 .

[25]  S. Barton,et al.  Chaos, self-organization, and psychology. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[26]  H. Eysenck Creativity and Personality: Suggestions for a Theory , 1993 .

[27]  Apara Ranjan,et al.  Understanding the creative process : personal signatures and cross-domain interpretations of ideas , 2014 .

[28]  Chris L. S. Coryn,et al.  Quantitative Methods for Estimating the Reliability of Qualitative Data , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[29]  Mike Steel,et al.  Autocatalytic networks in cognition and the origin of culture. , 2017, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  Allan Combs The Radiance of Being : Complexity, Chaos and the Evolution of Consciousness , 1995 .

[31]  Liane Gabora,et al.  A Study and Preliminary Model of Cross-Domain Influences on Creativity , 2015, CogSci.

[32]  R. Helson,et al.  In Search of the Creative Personality , 1996 .

[33]  James C. Kaufman,et al.  Sure, I'm Creative—But Not in Mathematics!: Self-Reported Creativity in Diverse Domains , 2004 .

[34]  D. Simonton Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. , 2010, Physics of life reviews.

[35]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[36]  Nikolaus Franke,et al.  Integrating Problem Solvers from Analogous Markets in New Product Ideation , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[37]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.

[38]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Do the best design ideas (really) come from conceptually distant sources of inspiration , 2015 .

[39]  Karl H. Pribram,et al.  Origins : brain and self organization , 2018 .

[40]  James C. Kaufman,et al.  Hawking's Haiku, Madonna's Math: Why It Is Hard to Be Creative in Every Room of the House. , 2004 .

[41]  E. Hong,et al.  Creative Thinking Ability: Domain Generality and Specificity , 2010 .

[42]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search , 2010, Organ. Sci..