Gender Electrified: ERP Evidence on the Syntactic Nature of Gender Processing

The central issue of this study concerns the claim that the processing of gender agreement in online sentence comprehension is a syntactic rather than a conceptual/semantic process. This claim was tested for the grammatical gender agreement in Dutch between the definite article and the noun. Subjects read sentences in which the definite article and the noun had the same gender and sentences in which the gender agreement was violated. While subjects read these sentences, their electrophysiological activity was recorded via electrodes placed on the scalp. Earlier research has shown that semantic and syntactic processing events manifest themselves in different event-related brain potential (ERP) effects. Semantic integration modulates the amplitude of the so-called N400. The P600/SPS is an ERP effect that is more sensitive to syntactic processes. The violation of grammatical gender agreement was found to result in a P600/SPS. For violations in sentence-final position, an additional increase of the N400 amplitude was observed. This N400 effect is interpreted as resulting from the consequence of a syntactic violation for the sentence-final wrap-up. The overall pattern of results supports the claim that the on-line processing of gender agreement information is not a content driven but a syntactic-form driven process.

[1]  H. Heinze,et al.  ERP Negativities During Syntactic Processing of Written Words , 1994 .

[2]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Event-related brain potentials. , 1990 .

[3]  D. Swinney,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  The ERP and cognitive psychology: Conceptual issues. , 1995 .

[5]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[6]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[7]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing. , 1994 .

[8]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  The representational structures of the language faculty and their interactions , 2000 .

[9]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 1999 .

[10]  W. Levelt.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[11]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  D. Mitchell,et al.  The Effects of Context and Content on Immediate Processing in Reading , 1978 .

[13]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  The Architecture of the Language Faculty , 1996 .

[14]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Access and integration: projecting sound onto meaning , 1989 .

[15]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech , 1993 .

[16]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  On the electrophysiology of language comprehension: Implications for the human language system , 2000 .

[17]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Event-related brain potentials and human language , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[19]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker , 1999 .

[20]  Thomas F. Mnte,et al.  Brain Activity Associated with Syntactic Incongruencies in Words and Pseudo-Words , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree , 1995 .

[22]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The Processing of Locally Ambiguous Relative Clauses in German , 1995 .

[23]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Dissociation of Brain Activity Related to Syntactic and Semantic Aspects of Language , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The neurocognition of syntactic processing , 1999 .

[25]  A. Friederici,et al.  Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.