One notable feature of recent sociological writing is the growing frequency with which actions are interpreted as forming part of a strategy. All sorts of social actors, from lowly individuals, through households, family businesses, social movements and classes, to mighty multi-national corporations and nation-states, have been represented as employing strategies, and sociologists' usage of the concept of `strategy' is now sufficiently common to warrant its investigation, especially since important and difficult issues are raised when it is adopted. Academic fashion may play a part in explaining the current prominence within the sociological vocabulary of the concept of `strategy', but greater significance should be attached to underlying trends in sociological theorising, even if these are not appreciated in every case where `strategy' is found being employed. Analysis of actions and their outcomes in terms of strategies carries with it the promise of avoiding some of the pitfalls of the classic agency/structure dichotomy, as well as shedding a different light on questions of rationality. Against this, it must be recognised that the extent to which social actions can be illuminated by focussing on strategies is variable; some actions are more open to investigation in terms of strategies than others.
[1]
John Urry,et al.
`The New Marxism of Collective Action: A Critical Analysis'
,
1984
.
[2]
L. Morris.
Redundancy and Patterns of Household Finance
,
1984
.
[3]
Gordon Marshall.
On the Sociology of Women's Unemployment, its Neglect and Significance
,
1984
.
[4]
M. Mann,et al.
Ruling Class Strategies and Citizenship
,
1987
.
[5]
B. Hindess.
Rational choice theory and the analysis of political action
,
1984
.
[6]
L. Morris.
Patterns of Social Activity and Post-Redundancy Labour-Market Experience
,
1984
.
[7]
M. Redclift.
SURVIVAL STRATEGIES IN RURAL EUROPE: CONTINUITY AND CHANGE
,
1986
.
[8]
Rosemary Crompton,et al.
White-collar Proletariat: Deskilling and Gender in Clerical Work
,
1984
.