Diffusional kurtosis imaging: The quantification of non‐gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging

A magnetic resonance imaging method is presented for quantifying the degree to which water diffusion in biologic tissues is non‐Gaussian. Since tissue structure is responsible for the deviation of water diffusion from the Gaussian behavior typically observed in homogeneous solutions, this method provides a specific measure of tissue structure, such as cellular compartments and membranes. The method is an extension of conventional diffusion‐weighted imaging that requires the use of somewhat higher b values and a modified image postprocessing procedure. In addition to the diffusion coefficient, the method provides an estimate for the excess kurtosis of the diffusion displacement probability distribution, which is a dimensionless metric of the departure from a Gaussian form. From the study of six healthy adult subjects, the excess diffusional kurtosis is found to be significantly higher in white matter than in gray matter, reflecting the structural differences between these two types of cerebral tissues. Diffusional kurtosis imaging is related to q‐space imaging methods, but is less demanding in terms of imaging time, hardware requirements, and postprocessing effort. It may be useful for assessing tissue structure abnormalities associated with a variety of neuropathologies. Magn Reson Med 53:1432–1440, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  R. Bammer Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[2]  Joseph A. Helpern,et al.  Quantifying Non-Gaussian Water Diffusion by Means of Pulsed-Field-Gradient MRI , 2003 .

[3]  Jörg Kärger,et al.  NMR self-diffusion studies in heterogeneous systems , 1985 .

[4]  C. Springer,et al.  Effects of equilibrium exchange on diffusion‐weighted NMR signals: The diffusigraphic “shutter‐speed” , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Y. Cohen,et al.  High b‐value q‐space analyzed diffusion‐weighted MRS and MRI in neuronal tissues – a technical review , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[6]  G. L. Bretthorst,et al.  Statistical model for diffusion attenuated MR signal , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  R. Edelman,et al.  A Phantom for diffusion‐weighted imaging of acute stroke , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[9]  Dmitriy A Yablonskiy,et al.  Quantitative in vivo assessment of lung microstructure at the alveolar level with hyperpolarized 3He diffusion MRI , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Elna-Marie Larsson,et al.  Visualisation of displacement-distribution parameters in q-space imaging , 2003 .

[11]  V. Wedeen,et al.  Reduction of eddy‐current‐induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice‐refocused spin echo , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  R. Chandra,et al.  Weak-Diffusion Theory of NMR Signal in Magnetically Heterogeneous Media , 1997 .

[13]  K. Balanda,et al.  Kurtosis: A Critical Review , 1988 .

[14]  Thomas L Chenevert,et al.  Clinical applications of diffusion tensor imaging , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  M. Moseley,et al.  Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 51:924–937 (2004) Characterizing Non-Gaussian Diffusion by Using Generalized Diffusion Tensors , 2022 .