Limits on climate sensitivity derived from recent satellite and surface observations

[1] An analysis of satellite and surface measurements of aerosol optical depth suggests that global average of aerosol optical depth has been recently decreasing at the rate of around 0.0014/a. This decrease is nonuniform with the fastest decrease observed over the United States and Europe. The observed rate of decreasing aerosol optical depth produces the top of the atmosphere radiative forcing that is comparable to forcing due to the current rate of increasing atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Consequently, both increasing atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases and decreasing loading of atmospheric aerosols are major contributors to the top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing. We find that the climate sensitivity is reduced by at least a factor of 2 when direct and indirect effects of decreasing aerosols are included, compared to the case where the radiative forcing is ascribed only to increases in atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide. We find the empirical climate sensitivity to be between 0.29 and 0.48 K/Wm−2 when aerosol direct and indirect radiative forcing is included.

[1]  Glen Lesins,et al.  Stronger Constraints on the Anthropogenic Indirect Aerosol Effect , 2002, Science.

[2]  R. F. Strickler,et al.  Thermal Equilibrium of the Atmosphere with a Convective Adjustment , 1964 .

[3]  K. Koltermann,et al.  How much is the ocean really warming? , 2007 .

[4]  David M. Holland,et al.  Trends in atmospheric sulfur and nitrogen species in the eastern United States for 1989–1995 , 1998 .

[5]  Syukuro Manabe,et al.  Thermal Equilibrium of the Atmosphere with a Given Distribution of Relative Humidity , 1967 .

[6]  Eric P. Shettle,et al.  Atmospheric Aerosols: Global Climatology and Radiative Characteristics , 1991 .

[7]  Christine A. O'Neill,et al.  Effects of Aerosol from Biomass Burning on the Global Radiation Budget , 1992, Science.

[8]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[9]  G. Hegerl,et al.  Climate sensitivity constrained by temperature reconstructions over the past seven centuries , 2006, Nature.

[10]  Leon D. Rotstayn,et al.  Indirect Aerosol Forcing, Quasi Forcing, and Climate Response , 2001 .

[11]  M. Mishchenko,et al.  Satellite remote sensing reveals regional tropospheric aerosol trends. , 2007, Optics express.

[12]  W. Wulf,et al.  Earth and Environmental Sciences , 2008 .

[13]  P. Cheeseman.  Paul Stolorz , Jet Propulsion Laboratory , California Institute of Technology , 2004 .

[14]  Stefano Schiavon,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. , 2007 .

[15]  P. Chylek,et al.  Effect of absorbing aerosols on global radiation budget , 1995 .

[16]  D. Stern.  Reversal in the Trend of Global Anthropogenic Sulfur Emissions , 2005 .

[17]  kwang-yul kim,et al.  On the transient response of a sample coupled climate system , 1992 .

[18]  S. Schwartz.  Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth's climate system , 2007 .

[19]  Y. Kaufman,et al.  Global dimming or local dimming?: Effect of urbanization on sunlight availability , 2005 .

[20]  J. Staehelin,et al.  Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich (IACETH) , 2008 .

[21]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  MISR Calibration and Implications for Low-Light-Level Aerosol Retrieval over Dark Water , 2005 .

[22]  K. Carslaw,et al.  Regional and global trends in sulfate aerosol since the 1980s , 2007 .

[23]  Reto Knutti,et al.  Constraints on radiative forcing and future climate change from observations and climate model ensembles , 2002, Nature.

[24]  J. Coakley,et al.  Aerosols and Climate , 1974, Science.

[25]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[26]  Brian Cairns,et al.  Long-Term Satellite Record Reveals Likely Recent Aerosol Trend , 2007, Science.

[27]  Vincent R. Gray.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[28]  Christopher S. Bretherton,et al.  Climate sensitivity and cloud response of a GCM with a superparameterization , 2006 .

[29]  Claus Fröhlich,et al.  Solar radiative output and its variability: evidence and mechanisms , 2004 .

[30]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  The Role of Climate Sensitivity and Ocean Heat Uptake on AOGCM Transient Temperature Response , 2002 .

[31]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Global indirect aerosol effects: a review , 2004 .

[32]  J. Hansen,et al.  Global temperature change , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  G. Myhre,et al.  New estimates of radiative forcing due to well mixed greenhouse gases , 1998 .

[34]  Max Frioud,et al.  Aerosols in polar regions: A historical overview based on optical depth and in situ observations , 2007 .

[35]  Z. X. Li,et al.  Interpretation of Cloud-Climate Feedback as Produced by 14 Atmospheric General Circulation Models , 1989, Science.

[36]  Hiroaki Miura,et al.  A climate sensitivity test using a global cloud resolving model under an aqua planet condition , 2005 .

[37]  Martin Wild,et al.  Impact of global dimming and brightening on global warming , 2007 .

[38]  Michael Schulz,et al.  Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and pre-industrial simulations , 2006 .

[39]  David G. Streets,et al.  Two‐decadal aerosol trends as a likely explanation of the global dimming/brightening transition , 2006 .

[40]  J. Gregory,et al.  The Climate Sensitivity and Its Components Diagnosed from Earth Radiation Budget Data , 2005 .