Putting a halt to unnecessary transfers: Do patients with isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage and Glasgow Coma Scale of 13 to 15 need a trauma center?

OBJECTIVES Trauma patients with isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage (iSAH) presenting to nontrauma centers are typically transferred to an institution with neurosurgical availability. However, recent studies suggest that iSAH is a benign clinical entity with an excellent prognosis. This investigation aims to evaluate the neurosurgical outcomes of traumatic iSAH with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 13 to 15 who were transferred to a higher level of care. METHODS The American College of Surgeon Trauma Quality Improvement Program was retrospectively analyzed from 2010 to 2015 for transferred patients 16 years and older with blunt trauma, iSAH, and GCS of 13 or greater. Those with any other body region Abbreviated Injury Scale of 3 or greater, positive or unknown alcohol/drug status, and requiring mechanical ventilation were excluded. The primary outcome was need for neurosurgical intervention (i.e., intracranial monitor or craniotomy/craniectomy). RESULTS A total of 11,380 patients with blunt trauma, iSAH, and GCS of 13 to 15 were transferred to an American College of Surgeon level I/II from 2010 to 2015. These patients were 65 years and older (median, 72 [interquartile range (IQR), 59–81]) and white (83%) and had one or more comorbidities (72%). Eighteen percent reported a bleeding diathesis/chronic anticoagulation on admission. Most patients had fallen (80%), had a GCS of 15 (84%), and were mildly injured (median Injury Severity Score, 9 [IQR, 5–14]). Only 1.7% required neurosurgical intervention with 55% of patients being admitted to the intensive care unit for a median of 2 days (IQR, 1–3 days). Furthermore, 2.2% of the patients died. The median hospital length of stay was only 3 days (IQR, 2–5 days), and the most common discharge location was home with self-care (62%). Patient factors favoring neurosurgical intervention included high Injury Severity Score, low GCS, and chronic anticoagulation. CONCLUSION Trauma patients transferred for iSAH with GCS of 13 to 15 are at very low risk for requiring neurosurgical intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/care management, Level IV.

[1]  A. Nathens,et al.  Isolated Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An Evaluation of Critical Care Unit Admission Practices and Outcomes From a North American Perspective , 2017, Critical care medicine.

[2]  B. White,et al.  Opportunity to reduce transfer of patients with mild traumatic brain injury and intracranial hemorrhage to a Level 1 trauma center , 2017, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[3]  Grant W. Mallory,et al.  Triage Patterns of Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Is Referral to a Tertiary Care Center Necessary? , 2017, World neurosurgery.

[4]  A. Levy,et al.  Outcomes of a nontransfer protocol for mild traumatic brain injury with abnormal head computed tomography in a rural hospital setting. , 2014, World neurosurgery.

[5]  Yuchiao Chang,et al.  Patients with traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage are at low risk for deterioration or neurosurgical intervention , 2013, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[6]  N. Mann,et al.  Methodology and analytic rationale for the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[7]  A. Levy,et al.  Should the management of isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage differ from concussion in the setting of mild traumatic brain injury? , 2011, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  M. Pasquale,et al.  The Trauma Quality Improvement Program of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[9]  B. Kessel,et al.  Effect of teleradiology upon pattern of transfer of head injured patients from a rural general hospital to a neurosurgical referral centre , 2007, Emergency Medicine Journal.