TRANSFER OF UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS

Introduction. This paper has as its primary purpose a clear exposition of the idea in [21] which we describe as transfer between real forms of a semi-simple Lie group over C. The basic point is that there are representations of one real form that can be more easily understood in the context of another real from. An interesting example is a minimal representation (that is annihilated by the Joseph ideal) of a split group over R. In the case when the complexification admits a Hermitian symmetric real form, minimal representations of that real form are part of the “analytic continuation of the holomorphic discrete series” (cf. [5]). For example, in the case of SO(4, 4) or split E7 one can “transfer” the holomorphic minimal representations of SO(6, 2) and Hermitian symmetric E7 respectively. If there is no Hermitian symmetric real form then since there is always a quaternionic real form one can do a similar transfer. We feel that this exposition is necssary since the original discussion had many misprints which could be confusing and also lacked, in some cases, proper reference to earlier related work. The secondary purpose is to give some new examples of its applicability. These examples give more evidence of ap ossible deep connection between the notion of transfer and Howe’s theory of dual pairs. We will now give a description of the paper. Let GC be a connected, simply connected semi-simple Lie group over C .L etG and

[1]  Chen-bo Zhu,et al.  Representations with scalarK-types and applications , 2003 .

[2]  P. M. Frajria Derived functors of unitary highest weight modules at reduction points , 1991 .

[3]  R. Howe Transcending classical invariant theory , 1989 .

[4]  Jian-Shu Li Singular unitary representations of classical groups , 1989 .

[5]  N. Wallach,et al.  Unitary derived functor modules with small spectrum , 1985 .

[6]  D. Vogan Unitarizability of Certain Series of Representations , 1984 .

[7]  N. Wallach On the unitarizability of derived functor modules , 1984 .

[8]  N. Wallach,et al.  Notes on homological algebra and representations of Lie algebras , 1980 .

[9]  M. Vergne,et al.  Restrictions and Expansions of Holomorphic Representations , 1979 .

[10]  N. Wallach The analytic continuation of the discrete series. II , 1979 .

[11]  W. Schmid Die Randwerte holomorpher Funktionen auf hermitesch symmetrischen Räumen , 1969 .

[12]  A. Borel,et al.  Continuous and differentiable cohomology for locally compact totally disconnected groups , 2000 .

[13]  B. Gross,et al.  Restriction of small discrete series represen-tations to symmetric subgroups , 2000 .

[14]  V. Varadarajan,et al.  The Mathematical Legacy of Harish-Chandra , 2000 .

[15]  A. Borel,et al.  Continuous Cohomology, Discrete Subgroups, and Representations of Reductive Groups , 1999 .

[16]  B. Gross,et al.  A Distinguished Family of Unitary Representations for the Exceptional Groups of Real Rank = 4 , 1994 .

[17]  N. Wallach Real Reductive Groups II , 1988 .

[18]  G. Zuckerman,et al.  Unitary representations with non-zero cohomology , 1984 .

[19]  T. Enright Unitary representations for two real forms of a semisimple lie algebra; a theory of comparison , 1983 .

[20]  N. Wallach,et al.  A Classification of Unitary Highest Weight Modules , 1983 .

[21]  D. Vogan Representations of real reductive Lie groups , 1981 .

[22]  R. Parthasarathy Criteria for the unitarizability of some highest weight modules , 1980 .

[23]  R. Howe θ-series and invariant theory, In Automorphic forms, representations and L-functions , 1979 .

[24]  R. Howe Series and invariant theory , 1977 .