Simulation Model of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle for Design Optimization

In this research, a stochastic simulation based design tool that facilitates design in a dynamic environment is developed. The simulation includes a full dynamic model of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) that was developed to evaluate the efiectiveness of such a craft given a set of physical attributes. These attributes include but are not limited to: speed, mass, moments of inertia, control gains in the auto-pilot, and target detection capabilities. The efiectiveness of the AUV is based upon the probability that it can successfully complete a given mission and how quickly it can complete this mission. The model is coupled with the Applied Research Lab’s unclassifled AUV problem that can compute weights, speeds, and e‐ciencies based on propulsor types, sonar conflgurations, and various other subsystems. In order to use this model in an optimization framework a mission was selected. This mission was to hit an oncoming torpedo before the torpedo was able to hit its target. The objective of this mission was to maximize the probability of successfully hitting the torpedo before the torpedo reaches its own target. In order to calculate this probability, the simulation was run with many difierent starting conflgurations including: difierent speeds of the oncoming torpedo, evasive maneuvers of the oncoming torpedo, and also various spacial orientations between the AUV and the targeted torpedo. This paper includes a detailed description of the simulation model, the development of the multidisciplinary design problem, and results obtained from the optimization of this problem.

[1]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  ATTRIBUTE-BASED MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION OF UNDERSEA VEHICLES , 2000 .

[2]  L. Watson,et al.  Adaptive Experimental Design for Construction of Response Surface Approximations , 2001 .

[3]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Adaptive experimental design for construction of response surface approximations , 2001 .

[4]  Timothy Prestero,et al.  Verification of a six-degree of freedom simulation model for the REMUS autonomous underwater vehicle , 2001 .

[5]  Poul Andersen,et al.  Hydrodynamics of Ship Propellers , 1993 .

[6]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical optimization techniques for engineering design , 1999 .

[7]  J. H. Starnes,et al.  Construction of Response Surface Approximations for Design Optimization , 1998 .

[8]  B. Grossman,et al.  Variable-complexity response surface approximations for wing structural weight in HSCT design , 1996 .

[9]  T. Simpson,et al.  Use of Kriging Models to Approximate Deterministic Computer Models , 2005 .

[10]  Benjamin C. Kuo,et al.  AUTOMATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS , 1962, Universum:Technical sciences.

[11]  T. Simpson,et al.  A Study on the Use of Kriging Models to Approximate Deterministic Computer Models , 2003, DAC 2003.

[12]  S. Hoerner Fluid-Dynamic Lift , 1985 .

[13]  T. Simpson,et al.  Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria , 2001 .

[14]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  REQUIREMENTS ON MDO IMPOSED BY THE UNDERSEA VEHICLE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PROBLEM , 2000 .

[15]  Benjamin C. Kuo,et al.  Automatic control systems (7th ed.) , 1991 .