Outcomes After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty from a Specific, Now-recalled Implant System.

[1]  C. Perka,et al.  Failure Analysis in Multiple TKA Revisions—Periprosthetic Infections Remain Surgeons’ Nemesis , 2022, Journal of clinical medicine.

[2]  D. Berry,et al.  What factors drive polyethylene wear in total knee arthroplasty? : results of a large retrieval series. , 2021, The bone & joint journal.

[3]  T. Wright,et al.  Early Aseptic Loosening with Increased Presence and Severity of Backside Burnishing in the Optetrak Logic Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Femoral Component , 2021, The Journal of Knee Surgery.

[4]  C. Peters,et al.  Outcomes of Rotating-hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2021, Surgical technology international.

[5]  Jacob T. Munro,et al.  Infection and periprosthetic fracture are the leading causes of failure after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty , 2021, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[6]  S. Young,et al.  Factors predicting repeat revision and outcome after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: results from the New Zealand Joint Registry , 2020, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[7]  M. Pagnano,et al.  Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review. , 2020, The bone & joint journal.

[8]  C. Peters,et al.  Revisiting the role of isolated polyethylene exchange for aseptic failures in total knee arthroplasty. , 2020, The Knee.

[9]  D. Berry,et al.  Long-Term Results of Total Knee Arthroplasty with Contemporary Distal Femoral Replacement. , 2020, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  L. B. Solomon,et al.  Evidence for Gender-Specific Bone Loss Mechanisms in Periprosthetic Osteolysis , 2019, Journal of clinical medicine.

[11]  J. Parvizi,et al.  The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. , 2018, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  O. Furnes,et al.  Failure of aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties , 2015, Acta orthopaedica.

[13]  M. Bostrom,et al.  Increased complication rate following conversion total hip arthroplasty after cephalomedullary fixation for intertrochanteric hip fractures: a multi-center study. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  C. Engh,et al.  Polyethylene Quality Affects Revision Knee Liner Exchange Survivorship , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  Javad Parvizi,et al.  Failure following revision total knee arthroplasty: infection is the major cause , 2011, International Orthopaedics.

[16]  C. Colwell,et al.  Isolated Tibial Polyethylene Insert Exchange Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  T. Fehring,et al.  THE MARK COVENTRY AWARD: Sterilization and Wear-related Failure in First- and Second-generation Press-fit Condylar Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2007 .

[18]  C. Engh,et al.  Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty: influence of tibial baseplate surface finish and sterilization of polyethylene insert. Findings at five to ten years postoperatively. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  D. W. Roberts,et al.  Factors Influencing Wear and Osteolysis in Press-Fit Condylar Modular Total Knee Replacements , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.