Evaluation of the quality of information on the Internet available to patients undergoing cervical spine surgery.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the quality of information available on the Internet to patients with a cervical pathology undergoing elective cervical spine surgery. METHODS Six key words ("cervical discectomy," "cervical foraminotomy," "cervical fusion," "cervical disc replacement," "cervical arthroplasty," "cervical artificial disc") were entered into two different search engines (Google, Yahoo!). For each key word, the first 50 websites were evaluated for accessibility, comprehensibility, and website quality using the DISCERN tool, transparency and honesty criteria, and an accuracy and exhaustivity scale. RESULTS Of 5,098,500 evaluable websites, 600 were visited; 97 (16%) of these websites were evaluated for quality and comprehensiveness. Overall, 3% of sites obtained an excellent global quality score, 7% obtained a good score, 25% obtained an above average score, 15% obtained an average score, 37% obtained a poor score, and 13% obtained a very poor score. High-quality websites were affiliated with a professional society (P = 0.021), had bibliographical references (P = 0.030), and had a recent update within 6 months (r = 0.277, P < 0.001). No correlation between global quality score and other variables was observed. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that the search for medical information on the Internet is time-consuming and often disappointing. The Internet is a potentially misleading source of information. Surgeons and professional societies must use the Internet as an ally in providing optimal information to patients.

[1]  H. Winn.  Youmans Neurological Surgery , 2003 .

[2]  Caroline L Kelham,et al.  Information for patients on medicines , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Eric Bouffet,et al.  Quality of health information on the Internet in pediatric neuro-oncology. , 2006, Neuro-oncology.

[4]  Jeffrey Barlow,et al.  Internet and American Life Project , 2006 .

[5]  S. Singletary,et al.  Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Peter C Black,et al.  Prostate cancer on the Internet--information or misinformation? , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[7]  R. Irving,et al.  The influence of the Internet on decision making in acoustic neuroma , 2005, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[8]  J Sybil Biermann,et al.  Melanoma information on the Internet: often incomplete--a public health opportunity? , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  T. Albert,et al.  Internet resources for spine surgeons. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[10]  David L. Greene,et al.  Lumbar Disc Herniation: Evaluation of Information on the Internet , 2005, Spine.

[11]  D Charnock,et al.  DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. , 1999, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[12]  A K John,et al.  A critical appraisal of internet resources on colorectal cancer , 2006, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[13]  Nadine E Foster,et al.  Back Pain Online: A Cross-Sectional Survey of the Quality of Web-Based Information on Low Back Pain , 2003, Spine.

[14]  J A Sproule,et al.  The Web: friend or foe of the hand surgeon? , 2003, Hand surgery : an international journal devoted to hand and upper limb surgery and related research : journal of the Asia-Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand.

[15]  L. Lau,et al.  [Analysis of paediatric neuro-oncological information on the Internet in German language]. , 2003, Klinische Padiatrie.

[16]  J. Rowland,et al.  Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980-2003). , 2005, Patient education and counseling.

[17]  J. Jamart,et al.  Information Internet en langue française en oncologie ORL , 2009 .

[18]  R. Rothman,et al.  Rothman-Simeone, the spine , 2006 .

[19]  Darren Hargrave,et al.  [Quality of childhood brain tumour information on the Internet in French language]. , 2003, Bulletin du cancer.

[20]  C. Paulino,et al.  Surfing for Scoliosis: The Quality of Information Available on the Internet , 2005, Spine.

[21]  J. Scholefield,et al.  Finding the best from the rest: evaluation of the quality of patient information on the Internet. , 2003, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[22]  S. Sabharwal,et al.  Readability of Spine-Related Patient Education Materials From Subspecialty Organization and Spine Practitioner Websites , 2009, Spine.

[23]  L. Lau,et al.  Childhood brain tumour information on the Internet in the Chinese language , 2006, Child's Nervous System.

[24]  Évaluation de l'information sur Internet destinée aux patients francophones en neuro-oncologie , 2007 .

[25]  W. Joyce,et al.  Information for surgical patients: implications of the World Wide Web. , 2001, The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica.

[26]  F. Pellisé,et al.  Patient information and education with modern media: the Spine Society of Europe Patient Line , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[27]  J. Powell,et al.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[28]  M. Gerling,et al.  Quality of information concerning cervical disc herniation on the Internet. , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[29]  Emma Irvin,et al.  Surfing for Back Pain Patients: The Nature and Quality of Back Pain Information on the Internet , 2001, Spine.

[30]  Rachelle Buchbinder,et al.  A Population-Based Survey of Back Pain Beliefs in Canada , 2006, Spine.

[31]  Gbogboade Ademiluyi,et al.  Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the Internet. , 2003, Patient education and counseling.