Set of injury risk curves for different sizes and ages

When new crash test dummy hardware becomes available it is important to establish how the measurements taken with that tool relate to a risk of injury. THORAX is a collaborative medium-scale project under the EC Seventh Framework. It focuses on the reduction and prevention of thoracic injuries. Within the project an improved understanding of thoracic injury mechanisms has been implemented in an updated design for the thorax-shoulder complex of the THOR dummy. The new dummy hardware, referred to as the THORAX demonstrator, has been evaluated in a number of biomechanical test conditions. The data from these tests has provided the opportunity to compare those data with injury outcome data under equivalent loading conditions. This report describes that comparison and the resulting injury risk curves developed. When developing injury risk functions for a new dummy it is common practice to repeat tests carried out with post-mortem human subjects (PMHS) with the crash test dummy. Matched dummy data and injury records from the PMHS tests are then used in the development of injury risk functions. Other approaches involve collection of real world accident events that have been recreated with the dummy in the laboratory. Both of these approaches have been adopted in this study. Injury risk functions are commonly developed for the average male in terms of size and age. However, age, gender and size influence the risk of injury for a given crash condition. Crash test dummies that take these differences into account may be developed in the future. However, as part of the THORAX project advanced scaling methods have been developed that can be used to modify the injury risk functions to account for gender and different sizes. Thereby the measurements obtained in crash tests with the THORAX demonstrator can be used to predict the risk for other occupant categories than those that are close to the average male. By providing the automotive industry with a superior crash test dummy, the new THORAX demonstrator, associated injury risk functions and scaling techniques it is expected that improved restraint systems will be developed that lead to a reduction of chest injuries.

[1]  Alan M. Nahum,et al.  Impact tolerance and response of the human thorax II , 1971 .

[2]  H. Mertz,et al.  HYBRID III STERNAL DEFLECTION ASSOCIATED WITH THORACIC INJURY SEVERITIES OF OCCUPANTS RESTRAINED WITH FORCE-LIMITING SHOULDER BELTS. FRONTAL CRASH SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE 90'S , 1991 .

[3]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  Injury risk curves for the WorldSID 50th male dummy. , 2009, Stapp car crash journal.

[4]  Joseph Shin,et al.  Quasi-static and dynamic thoracic loading tests: cadaveric torsos , 2007 .

[5]  J R Crandall,et al.  BIOFIDELITY EVALUATION OF THE THOR ADVANCED FRONTAL CRASH TEST DUMMY , 2000 .

[6]  James H. McElhaney,et al.  Human Torso Response to Blunt Trauma , 1973 .

[7]  D. Cox,et al.  Analysis of Survival Data. , 1986 .

[8]  Gianiuca Cesari,et al.  BEHAVIOUR OF HUMAN SURROGATES THORAX UNDER BELT LOADING. IN: SEAT BELTS: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ESSENTIAL SAFETY FEATURE , 1990 .

[9]  R. F. Neathery,et al.  Analysis of chest impact response data and scaled performance recommendations , 1974 .

[10]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  Development of Injury Criteria for Frontal Impact Using a Human Body FE Model , 2011 .

[11]  Jason Forman,et al.  Whole-body kinematic and dynamic response of restrained PMHS in frontal sled tests. , 2006, Stapp car crash journal.

[12]  Jean-Yves Foret-Bruno,et al.  THORACIC DEFLECTION OF HYBRID III: DUMMY RESPONSE FOR SIMULATIONS OF REAL ACCIDENTS , 1989 .

[13]  James Patrie,et al.  The Hybrid III dummy as a discriminator of injurious and non-injurious restraint loading. , 2003, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.