fMRI in alert, behaving monkeys: An adaptation of the human infant familiarization novelty preference procedure

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is increasingly used in non-human primate research. In the present study, we adapt the familiarization-novelty preference (FNP) procedure used in human infant research to examine visual behavior in alert, unanaesthetized rhesus monkeys that were acclimated to the fMRI environment, but did not undergo behavioral training. In keeping with the typical FNP paradigm, we recorded eye movements (looking time and number of fixations) while monkeys viewed a series of four identical pictures (familiarization phase) followed by two different pictures (novelty phase). Number of fixations and looking time both increased during the novelty phase, thereby demonstrating visual discrimination of the new from the old picture. Importantly, discrimination did not occur on catch trials in which six identical pictures were presented. Moreover, brain activation in the amygdala was more strongly associated with the novelty phase than with the familiarization phase. In addition, magnitude of brain activation in the amygdala was correlated with the behavioral effect of visual discrimination. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of using eye movements as an index of visual discrimination in untrained monkeys during fMRI scanning. This methodological approach helps to extend the repertoire of research tools for fMRI in non-human primates.

[1]  Miriam Scadeng,et al.  Direct comparison of visual cortex activation in human and non-human primates using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  B. N'Kaoua,et al.  Differential involvement of the human temporal lobe structures in short- and long-term memory processes assessed by intracranial ERPs. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[3]  F. Ramus,et al.  Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys. , 2000, Science.

[4]  Terrence R Stanford,et al.  Categorization in the monkey hippocampus: a possible mechanism for encoding information into memory. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Rapid Prefrontal-Hippocampal Habituation to Novel Events , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  R. Clark,et al.  Impaired Recognition Memory in Monkeys after Damage Limited to the Hippocampal Region , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  T. Matsuzawa,et al.  Preference for human direct gaze in infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) , 2003, Cognition.

[8]  Denis Mareschal,et al.  An Interacting Systems Model of Infant Habituation , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Methods for functional magnetic resonance imaging in normal and lesioned behaving monkeys , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[10]  P. MacNeilage,et al.  Numerical representations in primates. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R. Bhatt,et al.  Face processing in infancy: developmental changes in the use of different kinds of relational information. , 2005, Child development.

[12]  Dick J Veltman,et al.  Common pathway in the medial temporal lobe for storage and recovery of words as revealed by event‐related functional MRI , 2004, Hippocampus.

[13]  S. Rauch,et al.  Brain habituation during repeated exposure to fearful and neutral faces: A functional MRI study , 2003, Brain Research Bulletin.

[14]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  Similarities and differences in motion processing between the human and macaque brain: evidence from fMRI , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  E. T. Rolls,et al.  Neuronal responses related to the novelty and familiarity of visual stimuli in the substantia innominata, diagonal band of Broca and periventricular region of the primate basal forebrain , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Christopher I. Wright,et al.  Novelty responses and differential effects of order in the amygdala, substantia innominata, and inferior temporal cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[17]  B. Strange,et al.  Adaptive anterior hippocampal responses to oddball stimuli , 2001, Hippocampus.

[18]  Anders H. Andersen,et al.  Functional MRI of apomorphine activation of the basal ganglia in awake rhesus monkeys , 2000, Brain Research.

[19]  E. Rolls,et al.  The effects of stimulus novelty and familiarity on neuronal activity in the amygdala of monkeys performing recognition memory tasks , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Charles L. Wilson,et al.  Single Neuron Activity in Human Hippocampus and Amygdala during Recognition of Faces and Objects , 1997, Neuron.

[21]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  Visual Activation in Prefrontal Cortex is Stronger in Monkeys than in Humans , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  D. Premack,et al.  Infant chimpanzees spontaneously perceive both concrete and abstract same/different relations. , 1990, Child development.

[24]  Todd B. Parrish,et al.  Real-Time Monitoring of Eye Movements Using Infrared Video-oculography during Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Frontal Eye Fields , 2000, NeuroImage.

[25]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Combining Brains: A Survey of Methods for Statistical Pooling of Information , 2002, NeuroImage.

[26]  J. Fagan Memory in the infant. , 1970, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[27]  R A Andersen,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging in macaque cortex , 1998, Neuroreport.

[28]  Patricia S. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Viewing preferences of rhesus monkeys related to memory for complex pictures, colours and faces , 1994, Behavioural Brain Research.

[29]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Functional imaging of the monkey brain , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  K Lehnertz,et al.  Verbal novelty detection within the human hippocampus proper. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Novelty-related activation within the medial temporal lobes , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  G. Orban,et al.  Visual Motion Processing Investigated Using Contrast Agent-Enhanced fMRI in Awake Behaving Monkeys , 2001, Neuron.

[33]  Richard Grondin,et al.  Functional MRI studies in awake rhesus monkeys: methodological and analytical strategies , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[34]  Lukas Scheef,et al.  Novelty detection and repetition suppression in a passive picture viewing task: A possible approach for the evaluation of neuropsychiatric disorders , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[35]  R. L. Fantz Visual Experience in Infants: Decreased Attention to Familiar Patterns Relative to Novel Ones , 1964, Science.

[36]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Rapid Automated Algorithm for Aligning and Reslicing PET Images , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[37]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Severe tactual as well as visual memory deficits follow combined removal of the amygdala and hippocampus in monkeys , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[38]  Robert E. Clark,et al.  Impaired Recognition Memory in Rats after Damage to the Hippocampus , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  T. Albright,et al.  fMRI of Monkey Visual Cortex , 1998, Neuron.

[40]  Alex Martin,et al.  Automatic activation of the medial temporal lobe during encoding: Lateralized influences of meaning and novelty , 1999, Hippocampus.

[41]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Visual Representation in the Wild: How Rhesus Monkeys Parse Objects , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Visual recognition in monkeys following rhinal cortical ablations combined with either amygdalectomy or hippocampectomy , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[43]  M. W. Brown,et al.  Recognition memory: neuronal substrates of the judgement of prior occurrence , 1998, Progress in Neurobiology.

[44]  M. Bardo,et al.  Psychobiology of novelty seeking and drug seeking behavior , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[45]  P. Quinn,et al.  Learning Perceptual Organization in Infancy , 2005, Psychological science.

[46]  H. Eichenbaum The hippocampus: The shock of the new , 1999, Current Biology.

[47]  G. Orban,et al.  Extracting 3D from Motion: Differences in Human and Monkey Intraparietal Cortex , 2002, Science.

[48]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[49]  K. Swartz,et al.  Effects of familiarization time on visual recognition memory in infant pigtailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina). , 1986 .

[50]  J. Krüger,et al.  Evoking defined gaze directions in untrained awake monkeys , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[51]  H G Wieser,et al.  Human hippocampus associates information in memory. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  R A Andersen,et al.  Enhancing fMRI contrast in awake-behaving primates using intravascular magnetite dextran nanopartieles , 2001, Neuroreport.

[53]  A. Friederici,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of novelty processing: integrating ERP and fMRI results. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.