Application of Robotic and Mechatronic Systems to Neurorehabilitation

During the last decades, the potentiality of robotics as a tool for neuroscientific investigations has been demonstrated, thus contributing to increase knowledge on biological systems. On the other hand, a detailed analysis of the potentialities of these systems (Dario et al., 2003) based on recent neuroscientific achievements, in particular about the mechanisms of neurogenesis and cerebral plasticity underlying the motor learning and the functional recovery after cerebral injury, highlights the advisability of using the robotic technologies, as systems able to contribute to a breakthrough in the clinical procedures of neurorehabilitative treatments. Several examples of robotic machines applied to both neuroscience and neurorehabilitation can be found in the literature (Krebs et al., 1998; Colombo et al, 2000). One of the main scientific and technological challenges is represented by the design and development of innovative robotic and mechatronic systems able to i) simplify interaction modalities during assisted motor exercises, ii) enhance adaptability of the machines to the actual patient performance and residual abilities, iii) provide a comprehensive picture of the psycho-physiological status of the patient for assessment purposes, through the integrated use of brain imaging techniques. The basic assumption of this work relies on a human-centred approach applied to the design of robotic and mechatronic devices aimed at carrying out neuroscientific investigations on human sensorimotor behaviour, delivering innovative neurorehabilitation therapies and assessing the functional recovery of disabled patients. Special attention is paid to the issues related to human-machine interaction modalities inspired to human motor mechanisms and the design of machines for the analysis of human motor behaviour and the quantitative assessment of motor performance.

[1]  V. Dietz,et al.  Driven gait orthosis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients , 2001, Spinal Cord.

[2]  S. Rossignol,et al.  Enhancement of locomotor recovery following spinal cord injury. , 1994, Current opinion in neurology.

[3]  S. Rossignol,et al.  Recovery of locomotion after chronic spinalization in the adult cat , 1987, Brain Research.

[4]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  Assessment of gait in elderly people using mechatronic devices: preliminary results , 2003 .

[5]  S. Mazzoleni,et al.  An Ergonomic Dynamometric Foot Platform for Functional Assessment in Rehabilitation , 2006, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006..

[6]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study , 1997, The Lancet.

[7]  M. Morari,et al.  Adaptive robotic rehabilitation of locomotion: a clinical study in spinally injured individuals , 2003, Spinal Cord.

[8]  V. Dietz,et al.  Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  A Simple Robotic System for Neurorehabilitation , 2005, Auton. Robots.

[10]  R. Riener,et al.  Human-centered robotics applied to gait training and assessment. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  M. Bolliger,et al.  Modulation of locomotor activity in complete spinal cord injury , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  H Barbeau,et al.  Walking after spinal cord injury: evaluation, treatment, and functional recovery. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  香川 美仁,et al.  Effects of Robot Assisted Therapy , 2012 .

[14]  M. Munih,et al.  ALLADIN: A Novel Mechatronic Platform Assessing Post-Stroke Functional Recovery , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[15]  N. Hogan,et al.  Increasing productivity and quality of care: robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[16]  T. Platz,et al.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[17]  T. Hornby,et al.  Metabolic Costs and Muscle Activity Patterns During Robotic- and Therapist-Assisted Treadmill Walking in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury , 2006, Physical Therapy.

[18]  Marko Munih,et al.  The ALLADIN Diagnostic Device: An Innovative Platform for Assessing Post-Stroke Functional Recovery , 2007 .

[19]  V. Dietz,et al.  Clinical assessments performed during robotic rehabilitation by the gait training robot Lokomat , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[20]  G Colombo,et al.  Recovery from spinal cord injury--underlying mechanisms and efficacy of rehabilitation. , 2004, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[21]  H. Thieme Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects with Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2008 .

[22]  S. Sacco,et al.  Burden of first-ever ischemic stroke in the oldest old , 2004, Neurology.

[23]  Roland R Roy,et al.  Rehabilitative therapies after spinal cord injury. , 2006, Journal of neurotrauma.

[24]  S. Micera,et al.  Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[25]  A. Geurts,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Review Article: Plasticity of Spinal Centers in Spinal Cord Injury Patients: New Concepts for Gait Evaluation and Training , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[27]  J. Hidler,et al.  Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[28]  Fumio Harashima,et al.  Mechatronics - "What Is It, Why, and How?" An editorial , 1996, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[29]  P. Clark,et al.  Factors Influencing Stroke Survivors' Quality of Life During Subacute Recovery , 2005, Stroke.

[30]  R. Riener,et al.  Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[31]  P. Dario,et al.  Assessing Mechanisms of Recovery During Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation of the Upper Limb , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[32]  Sylvie Nadeau,et al.  Physical determinants, emerging concepts, and training approaches in gait of individuals with spinal cord injury. , 2006, Journal of neurotrauma.

[33]  P. Duncan,et al.  Measurement of Motor Recovery After Stroke: Outcome Assessment and Sample Size Requirements , 1992, Stroke.

[34]  J. Hidler,et al.  Alterations in muscle activation patterns during robotic-assisted walking. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[35]  Brett M. Kissela,et al.  Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2006 Update: A Report From the American , 2009 .

[36]  Robert Riener,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[37]  V. Dietz,et al.  Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[38]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Distributed plasticity of locomotor pattern generators in spinal cord injured patients. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[39]  Valentina Di Donna,et al.  Prediction of walking recovery after spinal cord injury , 2009, Brain Research Bulletin.

[40]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  On the analysis of knee biomechanics using a wearable biomechatronic device , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[41]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[42]  Maria Chiara Carrozza,et al.  Effects of a robot-mediated locomotor training in healthy and spinal cord injured subjects , 2008 .

[43]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Towards application of a mechatronic platform for whole-body isometric force-torque measurements to functional assessment in neuro-rehabilitation , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[44]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2009, Circulation.

[45]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[46]  S. Hesse,et al.  Gait rehabilitation machines based on programmable footplates , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[47]  N. Hogan,et al.  A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation , 2000, Neurology.

[48]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[49]  V. Feigin,et al.  Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century , 2003, The Lancet Neurology.