Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study

[1]  Wichor M Bramer.  Evaluation of instructive texts on searching medical databases. , 2015, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[2]  Neal R Haddaway,et al.  The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching , 2015, PloS one.

[3]  J. Ijzermans,et al.  Shifting paradigms in eligibility criteria for live kidney donation: a systematic review. , 2015, Kidney international.

[4]  H. Wichers,et al.  Systematic review on cashew nut allergy , 2014, Allergy.

[5]  R. de Vos,et al.  Strong Evidence Against Platelet-rich Plasma Injections for Chronic Lateral Epicondylar Tendinopathy , 2022 .

[6]  Dean Giustini,et al.  The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews , 2013, Systematic Reviews.

[7]  Martin Boeker,et al.  Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[8]  Stéfan Jacques Darmoni,et al.  Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[9]  Paolo Gardois,et al.  Effectiveness of bibliographic searches performed by paediatric residents and interns assisted by librarians. A randomised controlled trial. , 2011, Health information and libraries journal.

[10]  Christine Urquhart,et al.  Precision of healthcare systematic review searches in a cross‐sectional sample , 2011, Research synthesis methods.

[11]  P. Ormandy,et al.  Effectiveness of information skills training and mediated searching: qualitative results from the EMPIRIC project. , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[12]  Alan L. Mackay,et al.  Publish or perish , 1974, Nature.