Accounting for detectability when estimating avian abundance in an urban area

Urban areas can support significant bird populations, including species of conservation concern, but urban ecologists have been slow to apply detectability-based counting techniques. We compared abundances and relative abundances of eight urban birds, derived using two commonly applied techniques (fixed-radius point and strip sampling) and distance sampling. We evaluated the influence of habitat and two covariates (observer and whether birds were seen or heard) on detectability. Due to built-up structures in urban areas, point counts are appropriate. Unavoidable and sometimes complex but necessary interactions with multiple property owners may compromise the number of points able to be counted and therefore the precision of estimates. Abundances from strip and fixed-radius point counts were on average only one-third (strip) and less than one-half (fixed-radius point) those obtained using distance sampling, with interspecific variation in the degree to which densities were underestimated. Rankings of relative abundances were mostly similar, although distance sampling ranked silvereye (Zosterops lateralis) and grey warbler (Gerygone igata) relatively higher in residential habitat. Habitat did not appear to influence detectability for most species, but the two covariates (observer and seen/heard) improved model fit for a number of species, indicating it is useful to record this information. Well-standardised non-detectability-based counts could provide useful information on community structure and relative abundances in urban areas, but distance sampling is necessary to track the population status of species, although it cannot usefully be applied to rare species.

[1]  D. Chamberlain,et al.  The House Sparrow Passer domesticus in urban areas: reviewing a possible link between post-decline distribution and human socioeconomic status , 2008, Journal of Ornithology.

[2]  Claire Freeman,et al.  Development of an ecological mapping methodology for urban areas in New Zealand , 2003 .

[3]  Per Angelstam,et al.  Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space , 2006 .

[4]  Len Thomas,et al.  Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size , 2009, The Journal of applied ecology.

[5]  K. Gaston,et al.  Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent & structure of the resource in five major cities , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Detecting the scales at which birds respond to structure in urban landscapes , 2004, Urban Ecosystems.

[7]  R. Mathieu,et al.  Mapping private gardens in urban areas using object-oriented techniques and very high-resolution satellite imagery , 2007 .

[8]  N. Sodhi,et al.  Responses of avian guilds to urbanisation in a tropical city , 2004 .

[9]  S. Buckland Introduction to distance sampling : estimating abundance of biological populations , 2001 .

[10]  A. Suarez,et al.  Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape , 2004 .

[11]  K. Pollock,et al.  Effects of Vegetation and Background Noise on the Detection Process in Auditory Avian Point-Count Surveys , 2008 .

[12]  J. Silvertown A new dawn for citizen science. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  Rubén Ortega-Álvarez,et al.  Living in the big city: effects of urban land-use on bird community structure, diversity, and composition. , 2009 .

[14]  R. Schweinsburg,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BREEDING BIRDS, HABITAT, AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN GREATER TUCSON, ARIZONA , 1998 .

[15]  Darryl I. MacKenzie,et al.  Occupancy as a surrogate for abundance estimation , 2004, Animal Biodiversity and Conservation.

[16]  D. Doak,et al.  Book Review: Quantitative Conservation biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability analysis , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  Douglas H. Johnson In Defense of Indices: The Case of Bird Surveys , 2008 .

[18]  J. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Does variation in garden characteristics influence the conservation of birds in suburbia , 2006 .

[19]  Y. Heezik,et al.  Do domestic cats impose an unsustainable harvest on urban bird populations , 2010 .

[20]  John M. Marzluff,et al.  Importance of Reserve Size and Landscape Context to Urban Bird Conservation , 2004 .

[21]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  How many birds are there in a city of half a million people? , 2009 .

[22]  Stephen T. Buckland,et al.  POINT-TRANSECT SURVEYS FOR SONGBIRDS: ROBUST METHODOLOGIES , 2006 .

[23]  F. Weller,et al.  Reduction of bias when estimating bird abundance within small habitat fragments , 2012 .

[24]  R. Degraaf,et al.  Avian guild structure and habitat associations in suburban bird communities , 1986 .

[25]  R. Major,et al.  The influence of remnant bushland on the composition of suburban bird assemblages in Australia , 2003 .

[26]  Neil D. Burgess,et al.  Bird Census Techniques , 1992 .

[27]  F. Weller,et al.  Detection probability for estimating bird density on New Zealand sheep & beef farms , 2012 .

[28]  M. Hedblom,et al.  Landscape effects on birds in urban woodlands: an analysis of 34 Swedish cities , 2010 .

[29]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science as a Tool for Conservation in Residential Ecosystems , 2007 .

[30]  M. Robertson,et al.  Biotic homogenization and alien bird species along an urban gradient in South Africa , 2009 .

[31]  David L. Borchers,et al.  Point transect sampling with traps or lures , 2006 .

[32]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  A novel field evaluation of the effectiveness of distance and independent observer sampling to estimate aural avian detection probabilities , 2008 .

[33]  David R. Anderson,et al.  LANDBIRD COUNTING TECHNIQUES: CURRENT PRACTICES AND AN ALTERNATIVE , 2002 .

[34]  John Sabo,et al.  Morris, W. F., and D. F. Doak. 2003. Quantitative Conservation Biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA , 2003 .

[35]  M. I. Bellocq,et al.  Bird community responses along urban–rural gradients: Does the size of the urbanized area matter? , 2009 .

[36]  C. Catterall,et al.  BUSHLAND MODIFICATION AND STYLES OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT : THEIR EFFECTS ON BIRDS IN SOUTH-EAST QUEENSLAND , 1998 .

[37]  Robert B. Blair,et al.  The Effects of Urban Sprawl on Birds at Multiple Levels of Biological Organization , 2004 .

[38]  P. Geissler,et al.  Density estimation in wildlife surveys , 2004 .

[39]  Mark J. Antos,et al.  Introduced birds in urban remnant vegetation : does remnant size really matter? , 2006 .

[40]  J. Dunning,et al.  Effects of urbanization on breeding bird community structure in southwestern Desert habitats , 1989 .

[41]  Stephen T. Buckland,et al.  Estimating bird abundance: making methods work , 2008, Bird Conservation International.

[42]  C. T. Moore,et al.  Costs of detection bias in index–based population monitoring , 2004 .

[43]  E. Minot,et al.  Distribution and abundance of forest birds in the Ruamahanga Ecological Area, North Island, New Zealand , 1994 .

[44]  Mark J. Antos,et al.  Non-uniform bird assemblages in urban environments: the influence of streetscape vegetation , 2005 .

[45]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Ecological Census Techniques: Contents , 1996 .

[46]  Catriona J. MacLeod,et al.  Measuring occupancy for an iconic bird species in urban parks , 2012 .

[47]  L. Carrascal,et al.  Urban influence on birds at a regional scale: A case study with the avifauna of northern Madrid province , 2006 .