Describing and assessing track geometry quality

Track geometry quality has an important influence on the dynamic behaviour of the vehicles. Control of track geometry during the maintenance process and for the vehicle assessment (homologation) is necessary. Within the project, DYNOTRAIN methods for describing and assessing track geometry have been studied. Data from a comprehensive test campaign have been used to measure the effectiveness of different track geometry assessment methods. The vehicle behaviour has been studied by a multiple regression model with varying track geometry description methods. It had been shown that it is essential to include track geometry in the vehicle assessment process in a proper way. Depending on the assessment quantity and the vehicle type, the mostly used method in Europe (standard deviation in wavelength range 3–25 m) allows in combination with speed, cant deficiency and curvature the explanation of 20–80% of the total variation of the vehicle reaction. Other methods and ‘new’ alternative methods intended to model a typical vehicle behaviour mostly give no or only a small improvement.

[1]  Akiyoshi Yoshimura,et al.  A METHOD TO PREDICT TRACK GEOMETRY-INDUCED VERTICAL VEHICLE MOTION , 2004 .

[2]  Yan Liu,et al.  Performance-based track geometry and the track geometry interaction map , 2009 .

[3]  S. Weisberg Applied Linear Regression: Weisberg/Applied Linear Regression 3e , 2005 .

[4]  Nicholas Wilson,et al.  Performance-Based Track Geometry, Phase 1 , 2012 .

[5]  E. Berggren,et al.  A new approach to the analysis and presentation of vertical track geometry quality and rail roughness , 2008 .

[6]  Mats Berg,et al.  Assessing track geometry quality based on wavelength spectra and track–vehicle dynamic interaction , 2008 .

[7]  C. Esveld Modern railway track , 1989 .

[8]  Malik Beshir Malik,et al.  Applied Linear Regression , 2005, Technometrics.

[9]  Manfred Zacher Erfahrungen über das Zusammenwirken von Fahrzeug und Fahrweg im Hochgeschwindig-keitsverkehr bei der Deutschen Bahn AG , 2008 .

[10]  Jean-Paul Chilès,et al.  Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics , 2012 .

[11]  Mats Berg,et al.  Assessment of vertical track geometry quality based on simulations of dynamic track—vehicle interaction , 2009 .

[12]  Andreas Haigermoser,et al.  Track geometry evaluation method based on vehicle response prediction , 2010 .

[13]  Gustav Lönnbark Characterization of Track Irregularities With respect to vehicle response , 2012 .

[14]  Duo Li,et al.  Relating track geometry to vehicle performance using neural network approach , 2006 .

[15]  Jonas W. Ringsberg,et al.  Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems , 2005 .

[16]  Akiyoshi Yoshimura,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF ROLLING STOCK LATERAL DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS AND THEIR TRACK IRREGULARITY MAINTENANCE APPLICATIONS , 2005 .

[17]  Deutsche Bahn,et al.  An even more competitive and cost efficient railway Correlation between track geometry quality and vehicle reactions in the virtual rolling stock homologation process , .