To ensure that accurate failure-mode assessments are made, and ultimately to ensure that accurate design equations are formulated, a detailed analysis is needed of the procedure used to identify the cause of a connection failure. Misidentification of failure modes and the misuse of data can lead to serious errors in the accuracy and applicability of design equations. The load-capacity formulations presented in the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) Specification cannot be used to accurately predict the failure modes of thin cold-formed sheet-steel bolted connections that are loaded in shear. A modification to the bearing-coefficient provisions, to account for the reduced bearing resistance of the connected materials, is necessary and has been proposed by the writers in recent papers. A revision of the net-section fracture design method is also required. Recommendations concerning the procedure that is used to identify the net-section fracture and bearing-failure modes are made in this paper.
[1]
Roger A. LaBoube,et al.
Behavior of low ductility steels in Cold-Formed Steel connections
,
1996
.
[2]
Ken P. Chong,et al.
Thin Light-Gage Bolted Connections Without Washers
,
1979
.
[3]
Gregory J. Hancock,et al.
Screwed Connection Tests of Thin G550 and G300 Sheet Steels
,
1998
.
[4]
Gregory J. Hancock,et al.
Ductility of G550 Sheet Steels in Tension
,
1997
.
[5]
George Winter,et al.
Suggested Steel Ductility Requirements
,
1974
.
[6]
Ken P. Chong,et al.
Light-Gage Steel Bolted Connections without Washers
,
1975
.
[8]
G. Winter,et al.
Tests on Bolted Connections in Light Gage Steel
,
1956
.
[9]
Roger A. LaBoube.
Strength of Bolted Connections: Is It Bearing Or Net Section?
,
1988
.
[10]
Gregory J. Hancock,et al.
Bolted connection design for sheet steels less than 1.0 mm thick
,
1999
.