Identifying key parameters in cost-effectiveness analysis using value of information: a comparison of methods.

Decisions in health care must be made, despite uncertainty about benefits, risks, and costs. Value of information analysis is a theoretically sound method to estimate the expected value of future quantitative research pertaining to an uncertain decision. If the expected value of future research does not exceed the cost of research, additional research is not justified, and decisions should be based on current evidence, despite the uncertainty. To assess the importance of individual parameters relevant to a decision, different value of information methods have been suggested. The generally recommended method assumes that the expected value of perfect knowledge concerning a parameter is estimated as the reduction in expected opportunity loss. This method, however, results in biased expected values and incorrect importance ranking of parameters. The objective of this paper is to set out the correct methods to estimate the partial expected value of perfect information and to demonstrate why the generally recommended method is incorrect conceptually and mathematically.

[1]  Gordon B. Hazen,et al.  Erratum: Correction: Sensitivity Analysis and the Expected Value of Perfect Information , 2003 .

[2]  A E Ades,et al.  Expected Value of Sample Information Calculations in Medical Decision Modeling , 2004, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[3]  Gordon B. Hazen,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis and the Expected Value of Perfect Information , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[4]  M. Drummond,et al.  A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute For Clinical Excellence (NICE) , 2002, The Lancet.

[5]  K Claxton,et al.  An economic approach to clinical trial design and research priority-setting. , 1996, Health economics.

[6]  J Chilcott,et al.  Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: an updated rapid and systematic review and economic analysis. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[7]  M D Stevenson,et al.  Gaussian Process Modeling in Conjunction with Individual Patient Simulation Modeling: A Case Study Describing the Calculation of Cost-Effectiveness Ratios for the Treatment of Established Osteoporosis , 2004, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[8]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Applied Statistical Decision Theory. , 1961 .

[9]  J Chilcott,et al.  The clinical and cost-effectiveness of pulsatile machine perfusion versus cold storage of kidneys for transplantation retrieved from heart-beating and non-heart-beating donors. , 2003, Health technology assessment.

[10]  Jonathan Karnon,et al.  Planning the efficient allocation of research funds: an adapted application of a non-parametric Bayesian value of information analysis. , 2002, Health policy.

[11]  Karl Claxton,et al.  A Pilot Study of Value of Information Analysis to Support Research Recommendations for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence , 2005 .

[12]  John D. Graham,et al.  Going beyond the single number: Using probabilistic risk assessment to improve risk management , 1996 .

[13]  M Sculpher,et al.  A pilot study on the use of decision theory and value of information analysis as part of the NHS Health Technology Assessment programme. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[14]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Information Value Theory , 1966, IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern..

[15]  P Tappenden,et al.  Methods for expected value of information analysis in complex health economic models: developments on the health economics of interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate for multiple sclerosis. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[16]  M C Weinstein,et al.  Bayesian value-of-information analysis. An application to a policy model of Alzheimer's disease. , 2001, International journal of technology assessment in health care.

[17]  Bernie J O'Brien,et al.  Measures of importance for economic analysis based on decision modeling. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  A A Stinnett,et al.  Net Health Benefits , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.