Batch and Recursive Bayesian Estimation Methods for Nonlinear Structural System Identification

This chapter presents a framework for the identification of nonlinear finite element (FE) structural models using Bayesian inference methods. Using the input-output dynamic data recorded during an earthquake event, batch and recursive Bayesian estimation methods are employed to update a mechanics-based nonlinear FE model of the structure of interest (building, bridge, dam, etc.). Unknown parameters of the nonlinear FE model characterizing material constitutive models, inertia, geometric, and/or constraint properties of the structure can be estimated using limited response data recorded through accelerometers or heterogeneous sensor arrays. The updated nonlinear FE model can be used to identify the damage in the structure following a damage-inducing event. This framework, therefore, can provide an advanced tool for post-disaster damage identification and structural health monitoring. The batch estimation method is based on a maximum a posteriori estimation (MAP) approach, where the time history of the input and output measurements are used as a single batch of data for estimating the FE model parameters. This method results in a nonlinear optimization problem that can be solved using gradient-based and non-gradient-based optimization algorithms. In contrast, the recursive Bayesian estimation method processes the information from the measured data recursively, and updates the estimation of the FE model parameters progressively over the time history of the event. The recursive Bayesian estimation method results in a nonlinear Kalman filtering approach. The Extended Kalman filter (EKF) and Unscented Kalman filter (UKF) are employed as recursive Bayesian estimation methods herein. For those estimation methods that require the computation of structural FE response sensitivities (total partial derivatives) with respect to the unknown FE model parameters, the direct differentiation method (DDM) is used. Response data numerically simulated from a nonlinear FE model (with unknown material model parameters) of a five-story two-by-one bay reinforced concrete frame building subjected to bi-directional horizontal seismic excitation are used to illustrate the performance of the proposed framework.

[1]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Optimum Array Processing: Part IV of Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory , 2002 .

[2]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  The use of damage functionals in earthquake engineering: A comparison between different methods , 1993 .

[3]  Minho Kwon,et al.  A 3D hypoplastic model for cyclic analysis of concrete structures , 2001 .

[4]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Nonlinear finite element model updating for damage identification of civil structures using batch Bayesian estimation , 2017 .

[5]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  An Interior Point Algorithm for Large-Scale Nonlinear Programming , 1999, SIAM J. Optim..

[6]  Nestor Distefano,et al.  System Identification of Frames under Seismic Loads , 1976 .

[7]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Extended Kalman filter for material parameter estimation in nonlinear structural finite element models using direct differentiation method , 2015 .

[8]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[9]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 1995 .

[10]  Shamim N. Pakzad,et al.  Generalized Response Surface Model Updating Using Time Domain Data , 2014 .

[11]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[12]  R. Park,et al.  Stress-Strain Behavior of Concrete Confined by Overlapping Hoops at Low and High Strain Rates , 1982 .

[13]  D. Simon Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H Infinity, and Nonlinear Approaches , 2006 .

[14]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[15]  Rudolph van der Merwe,et al.  The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control Symposium (Cat. No.00EX373).

[16]  Rustem V. Shaikhutdinov,et al.  Bayesian State Estimation Method for Nonlinear Systems and Its Application to Recorded Seismic Response , 2006 .

[17]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Nonlinear structural design sensivitity analysis for path dependent problems. Part 1: General theory , 1990 .

[18]  Terje Haukaas,et al.  Model Uncertainty in Finite-Element Analysis: Bayesian Finite Elements , 2011 .

[19]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Dynamic response sensitivity of inelastic structures , 1993 .

[20]  A. Ang,et al.  Seismic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Buildings , 1985 .

[21]  Nestor Distefano,et al.  Sequential identification of hysteretic and viscous models in structural seismic dynamics , 1975 .

[22]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Dealing with uncertainty in model updating for damage assessment: A review , 2015 .

[23]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Real-Time Dynamic Model Updating of a Hysteretic Structural System , 2014 .

[24]  Nestor Distefano,et al.  System identification in nonlinear structural seismic dynamics , 1975 .

[25]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Damage Detection of Hysteretic Structures with a Pinching Effect , 2014 .

[26]  S. Popovics A numerical approach to the complete stress-strain curve of concrete , 1973 .

[27]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[28]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Material Parameter Identification in Distributed Plasticity FE Models of Frame-Type Structures Using Nonlinear Stochastic Filtering , 2015 .

[29]  Duong Hien Tran,et al.  Parameter Sensitivity in Nonlinear Mechanics: Theory and Finite Element Computations , 1997 .

[30]  Stefan Hurlebaus,et al.  Adaptive Reliability Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Bridges Using Nondestructive Testing , 2011 .