Improving PET/MR brain quantitation with template-enhanced ZTE

Purpose: The impact of MR‐based attenuation correction on PET quantitation accuracy is an ongoing cause of concern for advanced brain research with PET/MR. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new, template‐enhanced zero‐echo‐time attenuation correction method for PET/MR scanners. Methods: 30 subjects underwent a clinically‐indicated 18F‐FDG‐PET/CT, followed by PET/MR on a GE SIGNA PET/MR. For each patient, a 42‐s zero echo time (ZTE) sequence was used to generate two attenuation maps: one with the standard ZTE segmentation‐based method; and another with a modification of the method, wherein pre‐registered anatomical templates and CT data were used to enhance the segmentation. CT data, was used as gold standard. Reconstructed PET images were qualified visually and quantified in 68 volumes‐of‐interest using a standardized brain atlas. Results: Attenuation maps were successfully generated in all cases, without manual intervention or parameter tuning. One patient was excluded from the quantitative analysis due to the presence of multiple brain metastases. The PET bias with template‐enhanced ZTE attenuation correction was measured to be −0.9%±0.9%, compared with −1.4%±1.1% with regular ZTE attenuation correction. In terms of absolute bias, the new method yielded 1.1%±0.7%, compared with 1.6%±0.9% with regular ZTE. Statistically significant bias reduction was obtained in the frontal region (from −2.0% to −1.0%), temporal (from −1.2% to −0.2%), parietal (from −1.9% to −1.1%), occipital (from −2.0% to −1.1%) and insula (from −1.4% to −1.1%). Conclusion: These results indicate that the co‐registration of pre‐recorded anatomical templates to ZTE data is feasible in clinical practice and can be effectively used to improve the performance of segmentation‐based attenuation correction. HIGHLIGHTS:Co‐registration of anatomical templates to ZTE data is feasible in clinical practice and can improve the performance of segmentation‐based attenuation correction.The overall uptake bias was ˜35% lower when using template‐enhanced ZTE instead of regular ZTE attenuation correction.Statistically significant bias reduction was obtained in the frontal region (from ‐2.0% to ‐1.0%), temporal (from ‐1.2% to ‐0.2%), parietal (from ‐1.9% to ‐1.1%), occipital (from ‐2.0% to ‐1.1%) and insula (from ‐1.4% to ‐1.1%).

[1]  S. Holm,et al.  Region specific optimization of continuous linear attenuation coefficients based on UTE (RESOLUTE): application to PET/MR brain imaging , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  Yusheng Li,et al.  Attenuation correction in emission tomography using the emission data--A review. , 2016, Medical physics.

[4]  Marco Salvatore,et al.  Hybrid PET/MR Imaging and Brain Connectivity , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[5]  Stefan Förster,et al.  MR-Based Attenuation Correction Using Ultrashort-Echo-Time Pulse Sequences in Dementia Patients , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  S. Ourselin,et al.  MR Imaging-Guided Partial Volume Correction of PET Data in PET/MR Imaging. , 2016, PET clinics.

[7]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  Motion correction options in PET/MRI. , 2015, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[8]  S. Thiruvenkadam,et al.  Comparison of 4-class and continuous fat/water methods for whole-body, MR-based PET attenuation correction , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[9]  Felix Nensa,et al.  Clinical applications of PET/MRI: current status and future perspectives. , 2014, Diagnostic and interventional radiology.

[10]  Live Eikenes,et al.  PET/MR brain imaging: evaluation of clinical UTE-based attenuation correction , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  N. Costes,et al.  Multi-atlas attenuation correction supports full quantification of static and dynamic brain PET data in PET-MR , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  M. Soussan,et al.  Subject-specific bone attenuation correction for brain PET/MR: can ZTE-MRI substitute CT scan accurately? , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  A. Villringer,et al.  Feasibility and acceptance of simultaneous amyloid PET/MRI , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  Three‐dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[15]  S. Thiruvenkadam,et al.  Comparison of 4-Class and Continuous Fat/Water Methods for Whole-Body, MR-Based PET Attenuation Correction , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[16]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  A multi-centre evaluation of eleven clinically feasible brain PET/MRI attenuation correction techniques using a large cohort of patients , 2016, NeuroImage.

[17]  Hans Herzog,et al.  Template based attenuation correction for PET in MR-PET scanners , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[18]  S. Ourselin,et al.  Multi-Atlas–Based Attenuation Correction for Brain 18F-FDG PET Imaging Using a Time-of-Flight PET/MR Scanner: Comparison with Clinical Single-Atlas– and CT-Based Attenuation Correction , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  A. Drzezga,et al.  Current status and future role of brain PET/MRI in clinical and research settings , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  Casper Hansen,et al.  Motion correction in simultaneous PET/MR brain imaging using sparsely sampled MR navigators: a clinically feasible tool , 2015, EJNMMI Physics.

[21]  Yasheng Chen,et al.  MR-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI neurological studies with continuous-valued attenuation coefficients for bone through a conversion from R2* to CT-Hounsfield units , 2015, NeuroImage.

[22]  Long Jiang Zhang,et al.  PET/MRI of central nervous system: current status and future perspective , 2016, European Radiology.

[23]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Accurate PET/MR Quantification Using Time of Flight MLAA Image Reconstruction , 2014, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[24]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  Attenuation Correction Synthesis for Hybrid PET-MR Scanners: Application to Brain Studies , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  A. Buck,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of Zero-Echo-Time Attenuation Correction for Brain 18F-FDG PET/MRI: Comparison with Atlas Attenuation Correction , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  E. R. Kops,et al.  Hybrid approach for attenuation correction in PET/MR scanners , 2014 .

[27]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[28]  M. Conti Why is TOF PET reconstruction a more robust method in the presence of inconsistent data? , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  F. Wiesinger,et al.  Evaluation of Sinus/Edge-Corrected Zero-Echo-Time–Based Attenuation Correction in Brain PET/MRI , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  G. Delso,et al.  Zero TE MR bone imaging in the head , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  G. Delso,et al.  Evaluation of an Atlas-Based PET Head Attenuation Correction Using PET/CT & MR Patient Data , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[32]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Vision 20/20: Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation correction in PET/MRI: Challenges, solutions, and opportunities. , 2016, Medical physics.

[33]  S. Vandenberghe,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI Using Ultrashort Echo Time Sequences , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  Manuel Desco,et al.  Accuracy of CT-based attenuation correction in PET/CT bone imaging , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  ML-reconstruction for TOF-PET with simultaneous estimation of the attenuation factors , 2014, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[36]  David W Townsend,et al.  MRI-guided brain PET image filtering and partial volume correction , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Joint Estimation of Activity and Attenuation in Whole-Body TOF PET/MRI Using Constrained Gaussian Mixture Models , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[38]  A. Buck,et al.  Evaluation of Atlas-Based Attenuation Correction for Integrated PET/MR in Human Brain: Application of a Head Atlas and Comparison to True CT-Based Attenuation Correction , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[39]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[40]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  Toward Implementing an MRI-Based PET Attenuation-Correction Method for Neurologic Studies on the MR-PET Brain Prototype , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  Yi Su,et al.  Impact of MR-Based Attenuation Correction on Neurologic PET Studies , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[42]  Gaspar Delso,et al.  Incorporation of Time-of-Flight Information Reduces Metal Artifacts in Simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Simulation Study , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[43]  G. Hermosillo,et al.  Dixon Sequence with Superimposed Model-Based Bone Compartment Provides Highly Accurate PET/MR Attenuation Correction of the Brain , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.