A laboratory study on anticipatory movement in laparoscopic surgery: a behavioral indicator for team collaboration

BackgroundTo assess team collaboration in the context of laparoscopic surgery, laparoscopic cutting tasks performed by single operators and dyad teams were observed. Our previous work suggested that the anticipatory movement performed by a teammate may lead to a shorter total task time than for a single bimanual operator. This report further explores this phenomenon by quantifying the frequency of anticipatory movements and discussing their significance to team collaboration.MethodsSubjects were required to reach, grasp, and cut a piece of thread using a laparoscopic grasper and scissors. The task was performed by either 8 individual subjects bimanually or 16 paired subjects unimanually (using their preferred hands). The performances were video recorded. The total task time, the time used for thread grasping and cutting, and the number of anticipatory movements were computed and compared between the single operator and the dyad team group. In this report, anticipatory movement is defined as movements of the scissors before the completion of grasping and holding the thread.ResultsShorter durations of total task time were shown for the dyad than for the bimanual group. Anticipatory movements were counted significantly more often when the scissors were controlled by a teammate on the dyad team (96%) than when they were controlled by the preferred hand of the operator (45%). The number of anticipatory movements increased with practice, but no significant difference was shown among practice phases.ConclusionHigher frequency of anticipatory movement was observed in the dyad team, which led to superior performance for team collaboration, as compared with that of the single operator. Performance of anticipatory movements in the dyad team was explained by a shared mental model, which postulates combined capacity for information processing among team members. Results have implications for surgical education, team training, and error prevention in the performance of laparoscopic surgery.

[1]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[2]  M. West,et al.  Sharing the burden - teamwork in health care settings , 1999 .

[3]  J Annett,et al.  A method for measuring team skills , 2000, Ergonomics.

[4]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  Video analysis of endoscopic cutting task performed by one versus two operators , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[5]  Anthony G Gallagher,et al.  Human-Factors Lessons Learned from the Minimally Invasive Surgery Revolution , 2003, Seminars in laparoscopic surgery.

[6]  Charles Vincent,et al.  Systems Approaches to Surgical Quality and Safety: From Concept to Measurement , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[7]  HoeglMartin,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[8]  A. Cuschieri Visual Displays and Visual Perception in Minimal Access Surgery , 1995, Seminars in laparoscopic surgery.

[9]  B. B. Morgan,et al.  Team Workload: Its Meaning and Measurement , 1997 .

[10]  L. Swanstrom,et al.  A comparative study of a designated nursing team vs a nontrained team , 1997 .

[11]  Go Tani Marteniuk, R. G., (1976), Information Processing in Motor Skills., Holt, Rinehart and Winston. , 1981 .

[12]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Influence of direction of view, target‐to‐endoscope distance and manipulation angle on endoscopic knot tying , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[13]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  H Pashler,et al.  Dual-task interference and the cerebral hemispheres. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  Sensing and Manipulation Problems in Endoscopic Surgery: Experiment, Analysis, and Observation , 1993, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[16]  Warren D. Smith,et al.  Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[17]  S Undre,et al.  Developing observational measures of performance in surgical teams , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[18]  R. Reznick,et al.  Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[19]  Stephanie Guerlain,et al.  Assessing team performance in the operating room: development and use of a "black-box" recorder and other tools for the intraoperative environment. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[20]  R. Marteniuk Information processing in motor skills , 1976 .

[21]  B. Zheng,et al.  Reaction times and the decision-making process in endoscopic surgery , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[22]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Series in Applied Psychology. , 1997 .

[23]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  E A Franz,et al.  Spatial Coupling in the Coordination of Complex Actions , 1997, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[25]  Lorelei Lingard,et al.  Team Communications in the Operating Room: Talk Patterns, Sites of Tension, and Implications for Novices , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[26]  B. B. Morgan,et al.  An Analysis of Team Evolution and Maturation , 1993 .