Optimizing the spatial resolution of Channelrhodopsin-2 activation

Over the past few years, the light-gated cation channel Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) has seen a remarkable diversity of applications in neuroscience. However, commonly used wide-field illumination provides poor spatial selectivity for cell stimulation. We explored the potential of focal laser illumination to map photocurrents of individual neurons in sparsely transfected hippocampal slice cultures. Interestingly, the best spatial resolution of photocurrent induction was obtained at the lowest laser power. By adjusting the light intensity to a neuron’s spike threshold, we were able to trigger action potentials with a spatial selectivity of less than 30 μm. Experiments with dissociated hippocampal cells suggested that the main factor limiting the spatial resolution was ChR2 current density rather than scattering of the excitation light. We conclude that subcellular resolution can be achieved only in cells with a high ChR2 expression level and that future improved variants of ChR2 are likely to extend the spatial resolution of photocurrent induction to the level of single dendrites.

[1]  C. Stosiek,et al.  In vivo two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Rafael Yuste,et al.  Protein kinase A regulates calcium permeability of NMDA receptors , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Junichi Nakai,et al.  Characterization and Subcellular Targeting of GCaMP-Type Genetically-Encoded Calcium Indicators , 2008, PloS one.

[4]  H. Miyakawa,et al.  Optical detection of dendritic spike initiation in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons , 2003, Neuroscience.

[5]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Channelrhodopsin-2–assisted circuit mapping of long-range callosal projections , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Fischer,et al.  Rapid Actin-Based Plasticity in Dendritic Spines , 1998, Neuron.

[7]  Ernst Bamberg,et al.  Spectral characteristics of the photocycle of channelrhodopsin-2 and its implication for channel function. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  W. C. Hall,et al.  High-speed mapping of synaptic connectivity using photostimulation in Channelrhodopsin-2 transgenic mice , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Neural substrates of awakening probed with optogenetic control of hypocretin neurons , 2007, Nature.

[10]  Benjamin R. Arenkiel,et al.  In Vivo Light-Induced Activation of Neural Circuitry in Transgenic Mice Expressing Channelrhodopsin-2 , 2007, Neuron.

[11]  D. Muller,et al.  A simple method for organotypic cultures of nervous tissue , 1991, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Red-shifted optogenetic excitation: a tool for fast neural control derived from Volvox carteri , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  E. Bamberg,et al.  Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  T. Oertner,et al.  Optical induction of synaptic plasticity using a light-sensitive channel , 2007, Nature Methods.

[15]  T. Kues,et al.  Imaging and tracking of single GFP molecules in solution. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Feng Zhang,et al.  An optical neural interface: in vivo control of rodent motor cortex with integrated fiberoptic and optogenetic technology , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[17]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Sparse optical microstimulation in barrel cortex drives learned behaviour in freely moving mice , 2008, Nature.

[18]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.