The Determinants of Household Recycling: A Material Specific Analysis of Unit Pricing and Recycling Program Attributes

This paper examines the impact of two popular solid waste programs on the percent recycled of several different materials found in the residential solid waste stream. We examine a unique, national, household-level data set containing information on the percent recycled of five different materials: glass bottles, plastic bottles, aluminum, newspaper, and yard waste. We find that access to curbside recycling has a significant and substantial positive effect on the percentage recycled of all five materials and that the level of this effect varies across different materials. The length of the recycling program’s life has a significant and positive effect on two of the five materials and a mandatory recycling requirement does not affect any materials. The level of the unit price has an insignificant effect on all five materials.

[1]  Lans Bovenberg,et al.  Public economics and the environment in an imperfect world , 1995 .

[2]  M. Williams,et al.  Recycling: An Economic Analysis , 1991 .

[3]  Richard M. Adams,et al.  An Economic Analysis of Household Recycling of Solid Wastes: The Case of Portland, Oregon , 1993 .

[4]  Marie Lynn Miranda,et al.  Market-based Incentives and Residential Municipal Solid Waste , 1994 .

[5]  Robin R. Jenkins.  THE ECONOMICS OF SOLID WASTE REDUCTION , 1993 .

[6]  Scott J. Callan,et al.  The Impact of State and Local Policies on the Recycling Effort , 1997 .

[7]  Vijaya G. Duggal,et al.  Income and the recycling effort: a maximization problem , 1993 .

[8]  Robin R. Jenkins,et al.  Green Fees: How a Tax Shift Can Work for the Environment and the Economy , 1992 .

[9]  Michael J. Podolsky,et al.  Municipal Waste Disposal: Unit Pricing and Recycling Opportunities , 1998 .

[10]  Richard M. Adams,et al.  Household Responses to Price Incentives for Recycling: Some Further Evidence , 1999 .

[11]  James D. Reschovsky,et al.  Market incentives to encourage household waste recycling: Paying for what you throw away , 1994 .

[12]  Michael J. Podolsky,et al.  Assessing Incentive‐Based Environmental Policies For Reducing Household Waste Disposal , 1998 .

[13]  T. Sterner,et al.  Household Waste Management in a Swedish Municipality: Determinants of Waste Disposal, Recycling and Composting , 1999 .

[14]  Thomas C. Kinnaman,et al.  Household Responses to Pricing Garbage by the Bag , 1994 .

[15]  Marie Lynn Miranda,et al.  Unit pricing of residential municipal solid waste: lessons from nine case study communities , 1998 .

[16]  Thomas C. Kinnaman,et al.  Garbage and Recycling with Endogenous Local Policy , 2000 .

[17]  Thomas C. Kinnaman,et al.  The Economics of Residential Solid Waste Management , 1999 .

[18]  Robert Steuteville,et al.  The state of garbage in America , 1995 .

[19]  Thomas C. Kinnaman.  Explaining the Growth in Municipal Recycling Programs: The Role of Market and Non-Market Factors , 2000 .

[20]  Explaining the Growth in Municipal Recycling Programs , 2000 .

[21]  George Van Houtven,et al.  Household Behavior Under Alternative Pay-As- You-Throw Systems for Solid Waste Disposal , 1999 .