Using participatory design to determine the needs of informal caregivers for smart home user interfaces

Smart home technologies hold potential to help older adults with dementia complete activities independently, while alleviating the burden placed on their informal caregivers. Toward this goal, more research focus is needed to involve informal caregivers in the needs analysis and design of smart home user interfaces, for which they are likely to become primary users in the future. In this paper, we present our participatory design approach and the tensions that challenge user interface design for the intelligent COACH system that assists with activities of daily living in the home. Future work should involve older adults with dementia and other care stakeholders in user-centered design processes, and the development of systematic, interdisciplinary approaches for user interface design.

[1]  K. N. Dollman,et al.  - 1 , 1743 .

[2]  Birgitta Ljunggren,et al.  Relatives' opinions of IT support, perceptions of irritations and life satisfaction in dementia care , 2006, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[3]  Henry Brodaty,et al.  Family caregivers of people with dementia , 2009, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[4]  Robert J. Willis,et al.  National estimates of the quantity and cost of informal caregiving for the elderly with dementia , 2001, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[5]  B. Reimer,et al.  Older Adult Perceptions of Smart Home Technologies: Implications for Research, Policy & Market Innovations in Healthcare , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  P. Topo.  Technology Studies to Meet the Needs of People With Dementia and Their Caregivers , 2009 .

[7]  G. Gibson,et al.  Designing technology to improve quality of life for people with dementia: user-led approaches , 2010, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[8]  J. Forlizzi,et al.  Intelligent assistive technology applications to dementia care: current capabilities, limitations, and future challenges. , 2009, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[9]  R. Schulz,et al.  Family caregiving of persons with dementia: prevalence, health effects, and support strategies. , 2004, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[10]  Eric Campo,et al.  A review of smart homes - Present state and future challenges , 2008, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[11]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Participatory design with health consumers. , 2008, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[12]  Suzanne Martin,et al.  Smart home technologies for health and social care support. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Designing for cooperation: cooperating in design , 1991, CACM.

[14]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Principles of Smart Home Control , 2006, UbiComp.

[15]  Nirbhay N. Singh,et al.  Technology-aided pictorial cues to support the performance of daily activities by persons with moderate Alzheimer's disease. , 2012, Research in developmental disabilities.

[16]  J. Barbenel,et al.  The efficacy of an intelligent cognitive orthosis to facilitate handwashing by persons with moderate to severe dementia , 2004 .

[17]  Vincent Rialle,et al.  What Do Family Caregivers of Alzheimer’s Disease Patients Desire in Smart Home Technologies? , 2009, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[18]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Measuring usability: preference vs. performance , 1994, CACM.

[19]  A. Mihailidis,et al.  The COACH prompting system to assist older adults with dementia through handwashing: An efficacy study , 2008, BMC geriatrics.

[20]  Noam Shoval,et al.  Families’ and Professional Caregivers’ Views of Using Advanced Technology to Track People With Dementia , 2010, Qualitative health research.

[21]  Alex Mihailidis,et al.  The future of intelligent assistive technologies for cognition: devices under development to support independent living and aging-with-choice. , 2011, NeuroRehabilitation.

[22]  D. E. Mynatt.  Technology for Care Networks of Elders , 2004 .

[23]  Helianthe S.M. Kort,et al.  Supportive living environments: A first concept of a dwelling designed for older adults with dementia , 2009 .

[24]  Alex Mihailidis,et al.  The design of intelligent in-home assistive technologies: Assessing the needs of older adults with dementia and their caregivers , 2011 .

[25]  Khai N. Truong,et al.  The people-prototype problem: understanding the interaction between prototype format and user group , 2009, CHI.

[26]  Annakarin Olsson,et al.  My, your and our needs for safety and security: relatives' reflections on using information and communication technology in dementia care. , 2012, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[27]  Jesse Hoey,et al.  Zero Effort Technologies: Considerations, Challenges, and Use in Health, Wellness, and Rehabilitation , 2011, Synthesis Lectures on Assistive, Rehabilitative, and Health-Preserving Technologies.

[28]  P. Olivier,et al.  Keeping In Touch Everyday (KITE) project: developing assistive technologies with people with dementia and their carers to promote independence , 2009, International Psychogeriatrics.

[29]  Martin Pinquart,et al.  Spouses, adult children, and children-in-law as caregivers of older adults: a meta-analytic comparison. , 2011, Psychology and aging.

[30]  Anders Kottorp,et al.  Readiness for Technology Use With People With Dementia , 2012 .

[31]  T.L.J. Ferris,et al.  User-Centered Design: An Integrated Approach , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.