Enhancing Motor Imagery Performance by Antiphasic 10 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

Motor imagery (MI), as a cognitive motor process, involves the coordinated activation of frontal and parietal cortices and has been widely studied as an effective way to improve motor functions. However, there are large inter-individual differences in MI performance, with many subjects unable to elicit sufficiently reliable MI brain patterns. It has been shown that dual-site transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) applied on two brain sites can modulate functional connectivity between the targeted regions. Here, we investigated whether electrically stimulating frontal and parietal regions using dual-site tACS at mu frequency will modulate motor imagery performance. Thirty-six healthy participants were recruited and randomly divided into in-phase (0° lag), anti-phase (180° lag) and sham stimulation group. All groups performed the simple (grasping movement) and complex (writing movement) motor imagery tasks before and after tACS. Simultaneously collected EEG data showed that the event-related desynchronization (ERD) of mu rhythm and classification accuracy during complex task were significantly improved after anti-phase stimulation. In addition, anti-phase stimulation resulted in decreased event-related functional connectivity between regions within frontoparietal network in the complex task. In contrast, no beneficial after-effects of anti-phase stimulation were found in the simple task. These findings suggest that dual-site tACS effects on MI dependent on the phase lag of the stimulation and the complexity of the task. Anti-phase stimulation applied to the frontoparietal regions is a promising way to foster demanding MI task.

[1]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Riemannian distance based channel selection and feature extraction combining discriminative time-frequency bands and Riemannian tangent space for MI-BCIs , 2022, Journal of neural engineering.

[2]  Dong Ming,et al.  Enhancing Visual-Guided Motor Imagery Performance via Sensory Threshold Somatosensory Electrical Stimulation Training , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  F. Hummel,et al.  Targeting the frontoparietal network using bifocal transcranial alternating current stimulation during a motor sequence learning task in healthy older adults , 2022, Brain Stimulation.

[4]  M. Ding,et al.  Aftereffects of frontoparietal theta tACS on verbal working memory: Behavioral and neurophysiological analysis , 2021, bioRxiv.

[5]  D. Margulies,et al.  The default mode network in cognition: a topographical perspective , 2021, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  F. Hummel,et al.  Enhancing visual motion discrimination by desynchronizing bifocal oscillatory activity , 2021, NeuroImage.

[7]  Yun Qin,et al.  Enhancement of Event-Related Desynchronization in Motor Imagery Based on Transcranial Electrical Stimulation , 2021, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

[8]  Motoaki Kawanabe,et al.  Asymmetric directed functional connectivity within the frontoparietal motor network during motor imagery and execution , 2020, bioRxiv.

[9]  Jason M. Scimeca,et al.  Causal Evidence for a Role of Theta and Alpha Oscillations in the Control of Working Memory , 2020, Current Biology.

[10]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Assessment of the Efficacy of EEG-Based MI-BCI With Visual Feedback and EEG Correlates of Mental Fatigue for Upper-Limb Stroke Rehabilitation , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Dingguo Zhang,et al.  Effects of Task Complexity on Motor Imagery-Based Brain–Computer Interface , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  Xinjun Sheng,et al.  Tactile Stimulation Improves Sensorimotor Rhythm-Based BCI Performance in Stroke Patients , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Electric field dynamics in the brain during multi-electrode transcranial electric stimulation , 2018, Nature Communications.

[14]  F. Fröhlich,et al.  Network-targeted, multi-site direct cortical stimulation enhances working memory by modulating phase lag of low frequency oscillations , 2019, bioRxiv.

[15]  Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen,et al.  SimNIBS 2.1: A Comprehensive Pipeline for Individualized Electric Field Modelling for Transcranial Brain Stimulation , 2018, bioRxiv.

[16]  D. Yao,et al.  Brain Network Reconfiguration During Motor Imagery Revealed by a Large-Scale Network Analysis of Scalp EEG , 2018, Brain Topography.

[17]  Gregory A. Miller,et al.  Cross-frequency interactions between frontal theta and posterior alpha control mechanisms foster working memory , 2018, NeuroImage.

[18]  José del R. Millán,et al.  Sensory threshold neuromuscular electrical stimulation fosters motor imagery performance , 2018, NeuroImage.

[19]  Björn Herrmann,et al.  Temporal Expectation Modulates the Cortical Dynamics of Short-Term Memory , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Electric field dynamics in the brain during multi-electrode transcranial electric stimulation , 2018, bioRxiv.

[21]  Zachary Yaple,et al.  Modulation of the frontal-parietal network by low intensity anti-phase 20 Hz transcranial electrical stimulation boosts performance in the attentional blink task. , 2018, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[22]  Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen,et al.  How to target inter-regional phase synchronization with dual-site Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2017, NeuroImage.

[23]  S. Glover,et al.  The Motor-Cognitive Model of Motor Imagery: Evidence From Timing Errors in Simulated Reaching and Grasping , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Robert Leech,et al.  Externally induced frontoparietal synchronization modulates network dynamics and enhances working memory performance , 2017, eLife.

[25]  Andreas K Engel,et al.  Phase-Amplitude Coupling and Long-Range Phase Synchronization Reveal Frontotemporal Interactions during Visual Working Memory , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Bin He,et al.  Sensorimotor Rhythm BCI with Simultaneous High Definition-Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Alters Task Performance , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[27]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Higher Intelligence Is Associated with Less Task-Related Brain Network Reconfiguration , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Structural and functional correlates of motor imagery BCI performance: Insights from the patterns of fronto-parietal attention network , 2016, NeuroImage.

[29]  Rod C. Scott,et al.  Oscillation Phase Locking and Late ERP Components of Intracranial Hippocampal Recordings Correlate to Patient Performance in a Working Memory Task , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  Rudolf Stark,et al.  Motor imagery of hand actions: Decoding the content of motor imagery from brain activity in frontal and parietal motor areas , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[31]  M. Grueschow,et al.  The precision of value-based choices depends causally on fronto-parietal phase coupling , 2015, Nature Communications.

[32]  Mukesh Dhamala,et al.  Brain effective connectivity during motor-imagery and execution following stroke and rehabilitation , 2015, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Complex motor task associated with non-linear BOLD responses in cerebro-cortical areas and cerebellum , 2015, Brain Structure and Function.

[34]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  Simultaneous selection by object-based attention in visual and frontal cortex , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Theodore P. Zanto,et al.  Fronto-parietal network: flexible hub of cognitive control , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  Emiliano Santarnecchi,et al.  State-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Oscillatory Currents on the Motor System: What You Think Matters , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[38]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Effects of 10Hz and 20Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on motor functions and motor cortical excitability , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.

[39]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Attentional Stimulus Selection through Selective Synchronization between Monkey Visual Areas , 2012, Neuron.

[40]  M. Nitsche,et al.  The Importance of Timing in Segregated Theta Phase-Coupling for Cognitive Performance , 2012, Current Biology.

[41]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[42]  Qing Gao,et al.  Evaluation of effective connectivity of motor areas during motor imagery and execution using conditional Granger causality , 2011, NeuroImage.

[43]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[44]  K. Zentgraf,et al.  Cognitive motor processes: The role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations , 2009, Brain Research Reviews.

[45]  Thomas Dierks,et al.  BOLD correlates of EEG alpha phase-locking and the fMRI default mode network , 2009, NeuroImage.

[46]  W. Klimesch,et al.  What does phase information of oscillatory brain activity tell us about cognitive processes? , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[47]  C. Tenke,et al.  Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: II. Adequacy of low-density estimates , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[48]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[49]  C. Richards,et al.  Brain activations during motor imagery of locomotor‐related tasks: A PET study , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[50]  O. Jensen,et al.  Frontal theta activity in humans increases with memory load in a working memory task , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[51]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[52]  J. Martinerie,et al.  The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[53]  A. von Stein,et al.  Different frequencies for different scales of cortical integration: from local gamma to long range alpha/theta synchronization. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[54]  M. Jeannerod The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[55]  S. Makeig Auditory event-related dynamics of the EEG spectrum and effects of exposure to tones. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[56]  A. Guillot,et al.  Motor imagery, performance and motor rehabilitation. , 2018, Progress in brain research.

[57]  A. Papanicolaou,et al.  Modular Patterns of Phase Desynchronization Networks During a Simple Visuomotor Task , 2015, Brain Topography.

[58]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Could Anyone Use a BCI? , 2010, Brain-Computer Interfaces.

[59]  F. Perrin,et al.  Mapping of scalp potentials by surface spline interpolation. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.