Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning

The authors describe the effects of practice conditions in motor learning (e.g., contextual interference, knowledge of results) within the constraints of 2 experimental variables: skill level and task difficulty. They use a research framework to conceptualize the interaction of those variables on the basis of concepts from information theory and information processing. The fundamental idea is that motor tasks represent different challenges for performers of different abilities. The authors propose that learning is related to the information arising from performance, which should be optimized along functions relating the difficulty of the task to the skill level of the performer. Specific testable hypotheses arising from the framework are also described.

[1]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[2]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[3]  Robert B. Ammons,et al.  Motor Skills , 1951 .

[4]  J. Deese.  The psychology of learning , 1952 .

[5]  Sher ry Folsom-Meek,et al.  Human Performance , 2020, Nature.

[6]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[8]  C. Burt.  THE PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING , 1958 .

[9]  E. R. Crossman.  A THEORY OF THE ACQUISITION OF SPEED-SKILL∗ , 1959 .

[10]  F. M. Henry,et al.  Increased Response Latency for Complicated Movements and A “Memory Drum” Theory of Neuromotor Reaction , 1960 .

[11]  G. Miller,et al.  Plans and the structure of behavior , 1960 .

[12]  J. J. Lavery.  Retention of simple motor skills as a function of type of knowledge of results. , 1962 .

[13]  Edward A. Bilodeau,et al.  Acquisition of Skill , 1967 .

[14]  A. T. Welford,et al.  The fundamentals of skill , 1968 .

[15]  A. Battersby.  Plans and the Structure of Behavior , 1968 .

[16]  K. Connolly,et al.  Mechanisms of Motor Skill Development , 1971 .

[17]  J. Adams,et al.  A closed-loop theory of motor learning. , 1971, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Evidence for an error detection mechanism in motor skills. , 1972, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  O. L. Zangwill,et al.  Mechanisms of motor skill development , 1972 .

[20]  R. Marteniuk.  Information processing in motor skills , 1976 .

[21]  INFORMATION AND SKILL , 1977 .

[22]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  Adaptive training of perceptual-motor skills: issues, results, and future directions , 1978 .

[23]  J. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .

[24]  Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al.  Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .

[25]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[26]  M Whitehurst,et al.  The effects of contextual interference on females with varied experience in open sport skills. , 1982, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[27]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Laurie A. Broedling,et al.  Taxonomies of Human Performance: The Description of Human Tasks , 1984 .

[29]  J. Adams.  Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. , 1987 .

[30]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  Adaptive and part-whole training in the acquisition of a complex perceptual-motor skill , 1989 .

[31]  D. C. Shapiro,et al.  Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Heather Carnahan,et al.  When to Provide Knowledge of Results During Motor Learning: Scheduling Effects , 1990 .

[33]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning , 1990 .

[34]  R. Magill,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE EFFECT IN MOTOR SKILL ACQUISITION , 1990 .

[35]  Charles H. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference: Contributions of practice , 1990 .

[36]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Frequent Augmented Feedback Can Degrade Learning: Evidence and Interpretations , 1991 .

[37]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  The Perceptual-Motor Workspace and the Acquisition of Skill , 1991 .

[38]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in motor neuroscience , 1991 .

[39]  S P Swinnen,et al.  Adaptive tuning of interlimb attraction to facilitate bimanual decoupling. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[40]  Stephan P. Swinnen,et al.  The effect of movement speed on upper-limb coupling strength , 1992 .

[41]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[42]  T D Lee,et al.  Effects of aging and schedules of knowledge of results on motor learning. , 1992, Journal of gerontology.

[43]  B Alexander,et al.  The road to excellence. , 1995, RDH.

[44]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  The Road To Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games , 1996 .

[45]  R D Tandy,et al.  Optimal length for summary knowledge of results: the influence of task-related experience and complexity. , 1996, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[46]  H Carnahan,et al.  Modeled timing information during random practice eliminates the contextual interference effect. , 1997, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[47]  J. Doyon.  Skill learning. , 1997, International review of neurobiology.

[48]  Sheila Lennon,et al.  Advances in Motor Learning and Control , 1997 .

[49]  B. Thon,et al.  Differential effects of task complexity on contextual interference in a drawing task. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[50]  F. Brady.  A Theoretical and Empirical Review of the Contextual Interference Effect and the Learning of Motor Skills , 1998 .

[51]  Richard A. Magill,et al.  Motor Learning. Concepts and Applications , 1998 .

[52]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control , 1998, Neural Networks.

[53]  A. M. Gentile,et al.  Movement Science: Implicit and Explicit Processes during Acquisition of Functional Skills , 1998 .

[54]  D. Gopher,et al.  Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application. , 1999 .

[55]  C. Shea,et al.  Benefits of Blocked Over Serial Feedback on Complex Motor Skill Learning. , 1999, Journal of motor behavior.

[56]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. , 1999 .

[57]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Perspectives and problems in motor learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  R. Bjork,et al.  Metacognition in motor learning. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[59]  Babette Linquist,et al.  Motor Learning Concepts and Applications, 6th ed, , 2002 .

[60]  C. Shea,et al.  Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[61]  C. Koch,et al.  A framework for consciousness , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[62]  Rosemary S. Caffarella,et al.  The magazine publisher is the copyright holder of this article and it is reproduced with permission. Further reproduction of this article in violation of the copyright is prohibited. , 2005 .

[63]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis, 4th ed. , 2005 .

[64]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .