Cognitive task analysis for teaching technical skills in an inanimate surgical skills laboratory.

BACKGROUND The teaching of surgical skills is based mostly on the traditional "see one, do one, teach one" resident-to-resident method. Surgical skills laboratories provide a new environment for teaching skills but their effectiveness has not been adequately tested. Cognitive task analysis is an innovative method to teach skills, used successfully in nonmedical fields. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a 3-hour surgical skills laboratory course on central venous catheterization (CVC), taught by the principles of cognitive task analysis to surgical interns. METHODS Upon arrival to the Department of Surgery, 26 new interns were randomized to either receive a surgical skills laboratory course on CVC ("course" group, n = 12) or not ("traditional" group, n = 14). The course consisted mostly of hands-on training on inanimate CVC models. All interns took a 15-item multiple-choice question test on CVC at the beginning of the study. Within two and a half months all interns performed CVC on critically ill patients. The outcome measures were cognitive knowledge and technical-skill competence on CVC. These outcomes were assessed by a 14-item checklist evaluating the interns while performing CVC on a patient and by the 15-item multiple-choice-question test, which was repeated at that time. RESULTS There were no differences between the two groups in the background characteristics of the interns or the patients having CVC. The scores at the initial multiple-choice test were similar (course: 7.33 +/- 1.07, traditional: 8 +/- 2.15, P = 0.944). However, the course interns scored significantly higher in the repeat test compared with the traditional interns (11 +/- 1.86 versus 8.64 +/- 1.82, P = 0.03). Also, the course interns achieved a higher score on the 14-item checklist (12.6 +/- 1.1 versus 7.5 +/- 2.2, P <0.001). They required fewer attempts to find the vein (3.3 +/- 2.2 versus 6.4 +/- 4.2, P = 0.046) and showed a trend toward less time to complete the procedure (15.4 +/- 9.5 versus 20.6 +/- 9.1 minutes, P = 0.149). CONCLUSIONS A surgical skills laboratory course on CVC, taught by the principles of cognitive task analysis and using inanimate models, improves the knowledge and technical skills of new surgical interns on this task.

[1]  J. Sackier,et al.  A method of objectively evaluating improvements in laparoscopic skills , 1998, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  A. Martella,et al.  Priorities in general surgical training. , 1995, American journal of surgery.

[3]  M A Neerincx,et al.  Cognitive task analysis: harmonizing tasks to human capacities. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[4]  L P Mandel,et al.  TEACHING AND EVALUATING SURGICAL SKILLS , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  R. Clark,et al.  Cognitive task analysis for training , 1996 .

[6]  R. Reznick,et al.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[7]  Militello Lg Learning to think like a user: using cognitive task analysis to meet today's health care design challenges. , 1998 .

[8]  L. Militello Learning to think like a user: using cognitive task analysis to meet today's health care design challenges. , 1998, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[9]  J. Hamdorf,et al.  Acquiring surgical skills , 2000, The British journal of surgery.

[10]  R. Reznick,et al.  Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[11]  John R. Anderson Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[12]  A. Darzi,et al.  The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[13]  M F Whiteside,et al.  Halstedian Technique Revisited: Innovations in Teaching Surgical Skills , 1989, Annals of surgery.

[14]  Jan Maarten Schraagen,et al.  Cognitive Task Analysis and Innovation of Training: The Case of Structured Troubleshooting , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[15]  R. Cheifetz,et al.  Teaching and evaluation of basic surgical techniques: the University of British Columbia experience. , 1999, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[16]  Valerie L. Shalin,et al.  Cognitive task analysis , 2000 .

[17]  R. Reznick,et al.  Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination. , 1997, American journal of surgery.

[18]  L A Johnson,et al.  A cognitive task analysis for dental hygiene. , 2000, Journal of dental education.

[19]  R. Reznick,et al.  A technical-skills course for 1st-year residents in general surgery: a descriptive study. , 1992, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[20]  D. Maclellan,et al.  Formal teaching of basic surgical skills. , 1995, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[21]  R. Barnes Surgical Handicraft: Teaching and Learning Surgical Skills , 1987 .

[22]  G. Dunnington,et al.  A ten-year analysis of surgical education research. , 2000, American journal of surgery.