Studies to Determine the Operational Effects of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips on Two-Lane Undivided Roadways

This report describes the methodology and results of analyses performed to (1) evaluate the impact of shoulder rumble strips (SRS) and centerline rumble strips (CRS) on the placement of vehicles in the travel lane of two-lane, undivided roadways and (2) determine the minimum shoulder width required for drivers to correct errant vehicle trajectories once alerted by passing over SRS. Field studies indicated that CRS on two-lane, undivided roadways with lane widths as narrow as 10 ft do not adversely impact the lateral placement of the vehicle in the travel lane. In fact, at locations with smaller shoulder widths (1 to 2 ft) drivers positioned the center of their vehicles closer to the center of the lane. Similar effects were found at locations with both edgeline rumble strips (ERS) and CRS. The impact of SRS located within 7 to 9 inches of the edgeline on the lateral placement of vehicles in the travel lane was less clear. However, it does appear that SRS located near the edgeline may shift vehicle travel paths closer to the centerline. In contrast, SRS located 35 inches from the edgeline did not seem to impact the lateral placement of vehicles in the travel lane. In addition, lateral offsets that position the center of 16-in. SRS in the middle of the shoulders at least 4-ft wide should provide enough remaining shoulder width for the 85th percentile distracted driver to correct their errant vehicle trajectory before leaving the paved roadway surface. Additional findings from all of the studies and detailed recommendations are discussed in the report.

[1]  John S Higgins,et al.  RUMBLE STRIP NOISE , 1984 .

[2]  R H Hemion,et al.  THE EFFECT OF HEADLIGHT GLARE ON VEHICLE CONTROL AND DETECTION OF HIGHWAY VISION TARGETS , 1968 .

[3]  H Summala,et al.  Drivers' Steering Behavior When Meeting Another Car: The Case of Perceptual Tropism Revisited , 1981, Human factors.

[4]  Richard C. Moeur Analysis of Gap Patterns in Longitudinal Rumble Strips to Accommodate Bicycle Travel , 2000 .

[5]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Drivers' steering behavior when meeting another car , 2001 .

[6]  Lily Elefteriadou,et al.  RUMBLE STRIPS FOR ROADS WITH NARROW OR NON-EXISTENT SHOULDERS , 2001 .

[7]  Lily Elefteriadou,et al.  Development of Rumble Strip Configurations That Are More Bicycle Friendly , 2001 .

[8]  Paul J Carlson,et al.  Evaluation of Wet-Weather Pavement Markings: First Year Report , 2005 .

[9]  W Outcalt Bicycle-friendly rumble strips , 2000 .

[10]  Per Gårder RUMBLE STRIPS OR NOT ALONG WIDE SHOULDERS DESIGNATED FOR BICYCLE TRAFFIC , 1995 .

[11]  Eric T. Donnell,et al.  Evaluation of Effects of Centerline Rumble Strips on Lateral Vehicle Placement and Speed , 2004 .

[12]  David A Noyce,et al.  Safety evaluation of centerline rumble strips , 2003 .

[13]  J W Hall INNOVATIVE TREATMENTS FOR RUN-OFF-THE-ROAD ACCIDENTS. FINAL REPORT , 1991 .

[14]  M Helander,et al.  Drivers' Steering Behavior during Traffic Events: A Case of Perceptual Tropism? , 1978, Human factors.

[15]  Thomas J Triggs The Effect of Approaching Vehicles on the Lateral Position of Cars Travelling on a Two‐lane Rural Road , 1997 .

[16]  E R Russell,et al.  CENTERLINE RUMBLE STRIPS , 2005 .

[17]  Paul J Carlson,et al.  An Assessment of Various Rumble Strip Designs and Pavement Marking Applications for Crosswalks and Work Zones , 2005 .

[18]  G S Spring SHOULDER RUMBLE STRIPS IN MISSOURI , 2003 .

[19]  Paul J Carlson,et al.  Traffic Operational Impacts of Transverse, Centerline, and Edgeline Rumble Strips , 2005 .

[20]  H T Thompson,et al.  SURROGATE MEASURES FOR ACCIDENT EXPERIENCE AT RURAL ISOLATED HORIZONTAL CURVES , 1983 .

[21]  Hans-Peter Grabsch,et al.  Blind flight: Do auditory lane departure warnings attract attention or actual guide action? , 2005 .

[22]  Jr. John Hickey Shoulder Rumble Strip Effectiveness: Drift-Off-Road Accident Reductions on the Pennsylvania Turnpike , 1997 .

[23]  Richard A Retting,et al.  Crash reduction following installation of centerline rumble strips on rural two-lane roads. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Michael S. Griffith,et al.  Estimating Safety Benefits of Shoulder Rumble Strips on Two-Lane Rural Highways in Minnesota , 2007 .

[25]  Ronald Pfefer,et al.  GUIDANCE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AASHTO STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN. VOLUME 6: A GUIDE FOR ADDRESSING RUN-OFF-ROAD COLLISIONS , 2003 .

[26]  Ronald Pfefer,et al.  GUIDANCE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AASHTO STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN. VOLUME 4: A GUIDE FOR ADDRESSING HEAD-ON COLLISIONS , 2003 .

[27]  W Outcalt CENTERLINE RUMBLE STRIPS , 2001 .

[28]  Mitsuru Saito,et al.  Evaluation of Recent Traffic and Safety Initiatives, Volume III: Centerline Rumble Strips on Rural, Two-Way, Undivided Highways , 2005 .

[29]  David A Morena RUMBLING TOWARD SAFETY , 2003 .

[30]  Paul J Carlson,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF RUMBLE STRIPS ON TEXAS HIGHWAYS: FIRST YEAR REPORT , 2003 .

[31]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  The Influence of Oncoming Vehicles on Automobile Lateral Position , 1980 .

[32]  Darren J Torbic,et al.  A Guide for Reducing Collisions on Horizontal Curves , 2004 .

[33]  E Y-C Cheng,et al.  APPLICATION AND EVALUATION OF RUMBLE STRIPS ON HIGHWAYS , 1994 .

[34]  J F O'Hanlon,et al.  A PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF DEVICES FOR PREVENTING LANE DRIFT AND RUN-OFF-ROAD ACCIDENTS , 1974 .

[35]  Chung S Chen A study of effectiveness of various shoulder rumble strips on highway safety. , 1994 .