Platform-Independent Cirrus and Spectralis Thickness Measurements in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema Using Fully Automated Software

Purpose We determine whether the automated segmentation software, Duke Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Analysis Program (DOCTRAP), can measure, in a platform-independent manner, retinal thickness on Cirrus and Spectralis spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) images in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) under treatment in a clinical trial. Methods Automatic segmentation software was used to segment the internal limiting membrane (ILM), inner retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and Bruch's membrane (BM) in SD-OCT images acquired by Cirrus and Spectralis commercial systems, from the same eye, on the same day during a clinical interventional DME trial. Mean retinal thickness differences were compared across commercial and DOCTRAP platforms using intraclass correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Results The mean 1 mm central subfield thickness difference (standard error [SE]) comparing segmentation of Spectralis images with DOCTRAP versus HEYEX was 0.7 (0.3) μm (0.2 pixels). The corresponding values comparing segmentation of Cirrus images with DOCTRAP versus Cirrus software was 2.2 (0.7) μm. The mean 1 mm central subfield thickness difference (SE) comparing segmentation of Cirrus and Spectralis scan pairs with DOCTRAP using BM as the outer retinal boundary was −2.3 (0.9) μm compared to 2.8 (0.9) μm with inner RPE as the outer boundary. Conclusions DOCTRAP segmentation of Cirrus and Spectralis images produces validated thickness measurements that are very similar to each other, and very similar to the values generated by the corresponding commercial software in eyes with treated DME. Translational Relevance This software enables automatic total retinal thickness measurements across two OCT platforms, a process that is impractical to perform manually.

[1]  M. Maia,et al.  Primary intravitreal bevacizumab for diffuse diabetic macular edema: the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group at 24 months. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[2]  Sina Farsiu,et al.  Errata: Lateral and axial measurement differences between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography systems , 2015, Journal of biomedical optics.

[3]  Sina Farsiu,et al.  Validated automatic segmentation of AMD pathology including drusen and geographic atrophy in SD-OCT images. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  Sina Farsiu,et al.  Lateral and axial measurement differences between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography systems , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[5]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Signal normalization reduces systematic measurement differences between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  S. Sadda,et al.  Comparison of manually corrected retinal thickness measurements from multiple spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments , 2011, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[7]  Yijun Huang,et al.  Signal quality assessment of retinal optical coherence tomography images. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  N. Bressler,et al.  Reproducibility of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography retinal thickness measurements and conversion to equivalent time-domain metrics in diabetic macular edema. , 2014, JAMA ophthalmology.

[9]  Pratul P. Srinivasan,et al.  Fully automatic software for retinal thickness in eyes with diabetic macular edema from images acquired by cirrus and spectralis systems. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Applying an Open-Source Segmentation Algorithm to Different OCT Devices in Multiple Sclerosis Patients and Healthy Controls: Implications for Clinical Trials , 2015, Multiple sclerosis international.

[11]  F. Ferris,et al.  A Crossover Design for Comparative Efficacy: A 36-Week Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[12]  Sina Farsiu,et al.  Kernel regression based segmentation of optical coherence tomography images with diabetic macular edema. , 2015, Biomedical optics express.

[13]  R T Smith,et al.  Optimisation of an automated drusen-quantifying software for the analysis of drusen distribution in patients with age-related macular degeneration , 2013, Eye.

[14]  D. Bonett Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  Joan W. Miller,et al.  Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements on normal and pathologic eyes by different optical coherence tomography instruments. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  Axel Petzold,et al.  The OSCAR-IB Consensus Criteria for Retinal OCT Quality Assessment , 2012, PloS one.

[17]  Ziqiang Wu,et al.  Signal Strength is an Important Determinant of Accuracy of Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurement by Optical Coherence Tomography , 2009, Journal of glaucoma.

[18]  T. Peto,et al.  A prospective randomized trial of intravitreal bevacizumab or laser therapy in the management of diabetic macular edema (BOLT study) 12-month data: report 2. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[19]  W. Freeman,et al.  The association between percent disruption of the photoreceptor inner segment-outer segment junction and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[21]  Birgit Sander,et al.  Do different spectral domain OCT hardwares measure the same? Comparison of retinal thickness using third-party software , 2015, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[22]  H. Ahmadieh,et al.  Randomized trial of intravitreal bevacizumab alone or combined with triamcinolone versus macular photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[23]  Lloyd Paul Aiello,et al.  Reproducibility of macular thickness and volume using Zeiss optical coherence tomography in patients with diabetic macular edema. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[24]  Sandeep Saxena,et al.  Photoreceptor inner segment ellipsoid band integrity on spectral domain optical coherence tomography , 2014, Clinical ophthalmology.

[25]  Liang Liu,et al.  Automated volumetric segmentation of retinal fluid on optical coherence tomography. , 2016, Biomedical optics express.

[26]  M. Mandai,et al.  Recovery of photoreceptor outer segments after anti-VEGF therapy for age-related macular degeneration , 2013, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[27]  L. Fuentes-Broto,et al.  REPRODUCIBILITY AND REPEATABILITY OF CIRRUS AND SPECTRALIS FOURIER-DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY OF HEALTHY AND EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE EYES , 2013, Retina.

[28]  Nagahisa Yoshimura,et al.  Association between Hyperreflective Foci in the Outer Retina, Status of Photoreceptor Layer and Visual Acuity in Diabetic Macular Edema Running title: Hyperreflective foci, photoreceptor layer, and VA in DME , 2018 .

[29]  Elham Hatef,et al.  Comparison of Time Domain and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Measurement of Macular Thickness in Macular Edema Secondary to Diabetic Retinopathy and Retinal Vein Occlusion , 2012, Journal of ophthalmology.

[30]  T. Peto,et al.  A 2-year prospective randomized controlled trial of intravitreal bevacizumab or laser therapy (BOLT) in the management of diabetic macular edema: 24-month data: report 3. , 2012, Archives of ophthalmology.

[31]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Virtual Averaging Making Nonframe-Averaged Optical Coherence Tomography Images Comparable to Frame-Averaged Images , 2016, Translational vision science & technology.

[32]  Joseph A. Izatt,et al.  Automatic segmentation of seven retinal layers in SDOCT images congruent with expert manual segmentation , 2010, Optics express.