Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy for low-dysplastic isthmic spondylolisthesis: effects of slip reduction on surgical outcomes: clinical article.

OBJECT The management of isthmic spondylolisthesis remains controversial, especially with respect to reduction. There have been no reports regarding appropriate slip reduction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the following issues: (1) surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with total facetectomy for low-dysplastic isthmic spondylolisthesis, including postoperative complications; (2) effects of slip reduction on surgical outcomes; and (3) appropriate slip reduction. METHODS A total of 106 patients who underwent PLIF with total facetectomy for low-dysplastic isthmic spondylolisthesis and who were followed for at least 2 years were reviewed. The average follow-up period was 8 years. Surgical outcomes, including the scores assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system, the recovery rate, and postoperative complications were investigated. As for radiographic evaluations, pre- and postoperative slip and disc height, instrumentation failure, and fusion status were also examined. RESULTS The pre- and postoperative average Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores were 14 (range 3-25) and 25 (range 11-29) points, respectively. The average recovery rate was 73% (range 0%-100%). The average pre- and postoperative slip was 24% and 10%, respectively. A significant correlation between postoperative slip and clinical outcomes was found; clinical outcomes were better in proportion to slip reduction. Although no statistical difference was detected in clinical outcomes between postoperative slip of less than 10% and from 10% to 20%, patients with postoperative slip of more than 20% showed significantly worse clinical outcomes. Postoperative complications included neurological deficits in 7 patients (transient motor loss in 6 and permanent motor loss in 1), instrumentation failures in 7, adjacent-segment degeneration in 5, and nonunion in 4. Instrumentation failures occurred significantly more often in patients with more slip reduction, although slip reduction did not affect the other postoperative complications. All patients with instrumentation failure showed postoperative slip reduction within 10%. CONCLUSIONS The use of PLIF with total facetectomy for low-dysplastic isthmic spondylolisthesis appears to produce satisfactory clinical outcomes, with an average of 73% recovery rate and few postoperative complications. Although clinical outcomes were better in proportion to slip reduction, excessive reduction caused instrumentation failure, and patients with less reduction demonstrated worse clinical outcomes. Appropriate reduction resulted in a postoperative slip ranging from 10% to 20%.

[1]  Khaldoon M Bashaireh,et al.  Surgical management of low grade isthmic spondylolisthesis; a randomized controlled study of the surgical fixation with and without reduction , 2011, Scoliosis.

[2]  K. Yonenobu,et al.  Induction of early degeneration of the adjacent segment after posterior lumbar interbody fusion by excessive distraction of lumbar disc space. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[3]  K. Yonenobu,et al.  Excessive Distraction of Lumbar Disc Space Induces Early Degeneration of the Adjacent Segment after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion(PLIF) , 2008 .

[4]  Per Ekman,et al.  Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion in Adult Isthmic Spondylolisthesis , 2007, Spine.

[5]  A. Mehbod,et al.  Evidence-Based Medicine Analysis of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Treatment Including Reduction Versus Fusion In Situ for High-Grade Slips , 2007, Spine.

[6]  A. Miyauchi,et al.  Surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. Surgical technique. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  K. Kaneda,et al.  Radiological Risk Factors of Pseudoarthrosis and/or Instrument Breakage After PLF With the Pedicle Screw System in Isthmic Spondylolisthesis , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[8]  A. Miyauchi,et al.  Surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Sang-Hun Lee,et al.  Clinical Outcomes of 3 Fusion Methods Through the Posterior Approach in the Lumbar Spine , 2006, Spine.

[10]  Motoki Iwasaki,et al.  Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[11]  D. Schlenzka,et al.  Treatment of Severe Spondylolisthesis in Adolescence With Reduction or Fusion In Situ: Long-term Clinical, Radiologic, and Functional Outcome , 2006, Spine.

[12]  P. Roussouly,et al.  The Radiographic Results and Neurologic Complications of Instrumented Reduction and Fusion of High-Grade Spondylolisthesis Without Decompression of the Neural Elements: A Retrospective Review of 44 Patients , 2006, Spine.

[13]  H. Labelle,et al.  Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis in the presence of L5-s1 isthmic lysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis. , 2004, Spine.

[14]  W. Jacobs,et al.  Fusion for low-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a systematic review of the literature , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[15]  K. Hammerberg.  New Concepts on the Pathogenesis and Classification of Spondylolisthesis , 2005, Spine.

[16]  J. Ogilvie.  Complications in Spondylolisthesis Surgery , 2005, Spine.

[17]  W. Sears.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[18]  W. Sears.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lytic spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[19]  R. Molinari,et al.  Low-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Treated with Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in U.S. Servicemen , 2005, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[20]  H. Möller,et al.  The long-term effect of posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a randomized controlled study. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[21]  H. Reulen,et al.  “Isthmic” spondylolisthesis — an analysis of the clinical and radiological presentation in relation to intraoperative findings and surgical results in 72 consecutive cases , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[22]  Paul Park,et al.  Adjacent Segment Disease after Lumbar or Lumbosacral Fusion: Review of the Literature , 2004, Spine.

[23]  Cathy Lee,et al.  Nonunion of the spine: a review. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  M. Ricci,et al.  One-stage Posterior Decompression-Stabilization and Trans-sacral Interbody Fusion after Partial Reduction for Severe L5–S1 Spondylolisthesis , 2003, Spine.

[25]  S. Madan,et al.  Outcome of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion for Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis , 2002, Spine.

[26]  Anders Nordwall,et al.  Chronic Low Back Pain and Fusion: A Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Study From the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group , 2002, Spine.

[27]  P. Fritzell.  Chronic Low Back Pain and Fusion: A Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques , 2002 .

[28]  Y. Shimada,et al.  Outcome of One-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis and Postoperative Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Adjacent to the Fusion , 2000, Spine.

[29]  L. Lenke,et al.  Complications in the surgical treatment of pediatric high-grade, isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis. A comparison of three surgical approaches. , 1999, Spine.

[30]  L. Lenke,et al.  Complications in the Surgical Treatment of Pediatric High-Grade, Isthmic Dysplastic Spondylolisthesis , 1999 .

[31]  C Perka,et al.  Surgical Management of Severe Spondylolisthesis in Children and Adolescents: Anterior Fusion in Situ Versus Anterior Spondylodesis With Posterior Transpedicular Instrumentation and Reduction , 1997, Spine.

[32]  K. Cho,et al.  Adding Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion to Pedicle Screw Fixation and Posterolateral Fusion After Decompression in Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis , 1997, Spine.

[33]  F. Kummer,et al.  An Anatomic Evaluation of L5 Nerve Stretch in Spondylolisthesis Reduction , 1996, Spine.

[34]  D Schlenzka,et al.  Surgical treatment of severe isthmic spondylolisthesis in adolescents. Reduction or fusion in situ. , 1993, Spine.

[35]  R. Winter,et al.  Long-term evaluation of adolescents treated operatively for spondylolisthesis. A comparison of in situ arthrodesis only with in situ arthrodesis and reduction followed by immobilization in a cast. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[36]  K. Kaneda,et al.  Distraction Rod Instrumentation with Posterolateral Fusion in Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: 53 Cases Followed for 18–89 Months , 1985, Spine.