Using a Dual-Sourcing Option in the Presence of Asymmetric Information about Supplier Reliability: Competition vs. Diversification

We study a buyer's strategic use of a dual-sourcing option when facing suppliers possessing private information about their disruption likelihood. We solve for the buyer's optimal procurement contract. We show that the optimal contract can be interpreted as the buyer choosing between diversification and competition benefits. Better information increases diversification benefits and decreases competition benefits. Therefore, with better information the buyer is more inclined to diversify. Moreover, better information may increase or decrease the value of the dual-sourcing option, depending on the buyer's unit revenue: for large revenue, the buyer uses the dual sourcing option for diversification, the benefits of which increase with information; for small revenue, the buyer uses the dual sourcing option for competition, the benefits of which decrease with information. Surprisingly, as the reliability of the entire supply base decreases, the buyer may stop diversifying under asymmetric information (to leverage competition), whereas it would never do so under symmetric information. Finally, we analyze the effect of codependence between supply disruptions. We find that lower codependence leads the buyer to rely less on competition. Because competition keeps the information costs in check, a reduction in supplier codependence increases the buyer's value of information. Therefore, strategic actions to reduce codependence between supplier disruptions should not be seen as a substitute for learning about suppliers' reliabilities.

[1]  Zhibin (Ben) Yang,et al.  Supply risks and asymmetric information , 2009 .

[2]  Volodymyr Babich,et al.  Risk, Financing and the Optimal Number of Suppliers , 2007 .

[3]  Saibal Ray,et al.  Supply Side Story: Risks, Guarantees, Competition and Information Asymmetry , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Volodymyr Babich,et al.  Supply Disruptions, Asymmetric Information, and a Backup Production Option , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Volodymyr Babich,et al.  Independence of Capacity Ordering and Financial Subsidies to Risky Suppliers , 2008, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[6]  Sandy D. Jap An Exploratory Study of the Introduction of Online Reverse Auctions , 2003 .

[7]  Yimin Wang,et al.  On the Value of Mix Flexibility and Dual Sourcing in Unreliable Newsvendor Networks , 2005, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[8]  David Simchi-Levi,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the E-Business Era (International Series in Operations Research & Management Science) , 2004 .

[9]  Haresh Gurnani,et al.  A Bargaining Model for a First-Time Interaction Under Asymmetric Beliefs of Supply Reliability , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[10]  R. Myerson Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem , 1979 .

[11]  Jay Rubin,et al.  After the Quake , 2000 .

[12]  Charles J. Corbett,et al.  Stochastic Inventory Systems in a Supply Chain with Asymmetric Information: Cycle Stocks, Safety Stocks, and Consignment Stock , 2001, Oper. Res..

[13]  Nan Yang,et al.  Optimal Supply Diversification Under General Supply Risks , 2009, Oper. Res..

[14]  Goker Aydin,et al.  Decentralized Supply Risk Management , 2010 .

[15]  Maqbool Dada,et al.  A Newsvendor's Procurement Problem when Suppliers Are Unreliable , 2007, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[16]  Kevin B. Hendricks,et al.  The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth , 2003 .

[17]  Paul E. Fischer,et al.  Information, Contracting, and Quality Costs , 2000 .

[18]  Brian Tomlin,et al.  Impact of Supply Learning When Suppliers Are Unreliable , 2009, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[19]  Dilip Mookherjee,et al.  Dominant Strategy Implementation of Bayesian incentive Compatible Allocation Rules , 1992 .

[20]  L. Wein,et al.  An Inverse-Optimization-Based Auction Mechanism to Support a Multi-Attribute Rfq Process , 2001 .

[21]  Izak Duenyas,et al.  Total-Cost Procurement Auctions: Impact of Suppliers' Cost Adjustments on Auction Format Choice , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Brian Tomlin,et al.  Operational Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risk , 2011 .

[23]  Panos Kouvelis,et al.  Handbook of Integrated Risk Management in Global Supply Chains , 2011 .

[24]  Wedad Elmaghraby Auctions and Pricing in E-Marketplaces , 2004 .

[25]  Aadhaar Chaturvedi,et al.  Optimal Procurement Design in the Presence of Supply Risk , 2011, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[26]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supplier–supplier relationships in the buyer–supplier triad: Building theories from eight case studies , 2005 .

[27]  Damian R. Beil,et al.  RFQ Auctions with Supplier Qualification Screening , 2009, Oper. Res..

[28]  Volodymyr Babich,et al.  Competition and Diversification Effects in Supply Chains with Supplier Default Risk , 2006, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[29]  Wei Shi Lim,et al.  Producer-Supplier Contracts with Incomplete Information , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Daniel F. Spulber,et al.  Managing procurement auctions , 1990 .

[31]  K. Moorthy Using Game Theory to Model Competition , 1985 .

[32]  Brian Tomlin,et al.  On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks , 2006, Manag. Sci..