The Value of Relative Quality in Video Delivery

Estimating perceived quality of video is typically done by gauging the user's response on an absolute scale of ratings (excellent, good, fair, poor and bad). However, the internal representation of these adjectives to the stimuli varies significantly in different people. Even though the goal is to make an absolute estimate of the perceived quality, these questions reveal merely relative tendencies due the incorporated bias and variability in the responses. We present results from quality assessment based on estimates of relative quality distances between samples, by asking the question in the form or comparison rather than rating. This, two-alternative forced choice method scales the differences in a form of psychometric function, which presents the utility of the perceived quality on a measurable objective value. We argue that this relativistic mapping with low variance is more useful in video delivery because it offers an accurate way to optimize the resources.

[1]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[2]  Susan A. Murphy,et al.  Monographs on statistics and applied probability , 1990 .

[3]  W. Ehrenstein,et al.  Psychophysical Methods , 1999 .

[4]  Roger N. Shepard,et al.  Psychological relations and psychophysical scales: On the status of “direct” psychophysical measurement ☆ , 1981 .

[5]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[6]  Christophe Charrier,et al.  Maximum likelihood difference scaling of image quality in compression-degraded images. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[7]  Kenneth Knoblauch,et al.  MLDS: Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling in R , 2008 .

[8]  D. Krantz A theory of magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching☆ , 1972 .

[9]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[10]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  Proposal : Measurement of a JND Scale for Video Quality , 2000 .

[11]  Laurence T Maloney,et al.  Maximum likelihood difference scaling. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I: Additive and Polynomial Representations , 1991 .

[13]  Jaap Van Brakel,et al.  Foundations of measurement , 1983 .

[14]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  The Evolution of Video Quality Measurement: From PSNR to Hybrid Metrics , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[15]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A subjective study to evaluate video quality assessment algorithms , 2010, Electronic Imaging.

[16]  Rajiv Soundararajan,et al.  Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Video , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  D. Krantz A theory of context effects based on cross-context matching , 1968 .

[18]  Roger N. Shaepard On the Status of "Direct" Psychophysical Measurement , 1978 .