Sensory and cognitive mechanisms for preattentive change detection in auditory cortex

In order to react adequately to potentially relevant information outside the focus of attention, our brain preattentively scans the acoustic environment for irregularities. Two different mechanisms are currently discussed: (i) a sensory one based on differential states of refractoriness of neurons sensitive to the features of a regular event and of neurons sensitive to features of an irregular event; (ii) a cognitive one based on a comparison of short‐lived memory representations encoding current stimulation and the invariance inherent in recent recurrent stimulation. Here, we identified regions that mediate either of the two mechanisms by combining functional magnetic resonance imaging with an experimental protocol controlling for refractoriness. The sensory mechanism was associated with activity in the primary auditory cortex, whereas the cognitive one revealed activity in nonprimary auditory areas in the anterior part of Heschl's Gyrus. Moreover, it turned out that in the traditional oddball paradigm both mechanisms contribute to irregularity detection.

[1]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Electrophysiology of Attention , 2002 .

[2]  D G Norris,et al.  Reduced power multislice MDEFT imaging , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  A. Friederici,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of novelty processing: integrating ERP and fMRI results. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  The varieties of deviant experience: ERP manifestations of deviance processors , 1997 .

[5]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Imaging at high magnetic fields: initial experiences at 4 T. , 1993, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[6]  G Lohmann,et al.  LIPSIA--a new software system for the evaluation of functional magnetic resonance images of the human brain. , 2001, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[7]  E. Schröger,et al.  Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch? , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[8]  Wolfgang Grodd,et al.  Mismatch responses to randomized gradient switching noise as reflected by fMRI and whole‐head magnetoencephalography , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[9]  P. Morosan,et al.  Human Primary Auditory Cortex: Cytoarchitectonic Subdivisions and Mapping into a Spatial Reference System , 2001, NeuroImage.

[10]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Event‐related f MRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Higher-order processes in auditory-change detection , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Electromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex generated by sensory-memory based processing of tone-frequency changes , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. , 1978, Acta psychologica.

[14]  M Hoke,et al.  Tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex: pitch versus frequency representation. , 1989, Science.

[15]  M. Scherg,et al.  A Source Analysis of the Late Human Auditory Evoked Potentials , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  T. Carrell,et al.  Auditory Neurophysiologic Responses and Discrimination Deficits in Children with Learning Problems , 1996, Science.

[17]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[18]  Bernd Lütkenhöner,et al.  Localization of Primary Auditory Cortex in Humans by Magnetoencephalography , 2003, NeuroImage.

[19]  R J Ilmoniemi,et al.  Tonotopic auditory cortex and the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) equivalent of the mismatch negativity. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[20]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[21]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Neurotoxic effects of acrylamide on rat retinogeniculate fibres , 1984, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  K. Alho,et al.  Lateralized automatic auditory processing of phonetic versus musical information: A PET study , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[23]  E. Schröger On the detection of auditory deviations: a pre-attentive activation model. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[24]  P. Morosan,et al.  Probabilistic Mapping and Volume Measurement of Human Primary Auditory Cortex , 2001, NeuroImage.

[25]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  Is It Tonotopy after All? , 2002, NeuroImage.

[26]  M Don,et al.  The Mismatch Negativity in Cochlear Implant Users , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[27]  E. Schröger,et al.  Differential Contribution of Frontal and Temporal Cortices to Auditory Change Detection: fMRI and ERP Results , 2002, NeuroImage.

[28]  R. Näätänen The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[29]  E. Schröger Measurement and interpretation of the mismatch negativity , 1998 .

[30]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex. , 1982, Science.

[31]  I. Winkler,et al.  Involuntary Attention and Distractibility as Evaluated with Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.

[32]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Combining electrophysiological and hemodynamic measures of the auditory oddball. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[33]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[34]  István Ulbert,et al.  Separation of mismatch negativity and the N1 wave in the auditory cortex of the cat: a topographic study , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Human auditory-cortex mechanisms of preattentive sound discrimination , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[36]  T. Lewis,et al.  Event-related potentials — neurophysiological tools for predicting emergence and early outcome from traumatic coma , 2005, Intensive Care Medicine.

[37]  J. Haxby,et al.  fMRI study of face perception and memory using random stimulus sequences. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.